Cited by 107Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsStudent Assessment and FeedbackVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning

Open access

Latifi, Saeed, Noroozi, Omid, Talaee, Ebrahim·2023·Interactive Learning Environments

DOI 10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

This study compared the effects of worked example and scripting on students’ argumentative peer feedback, essay and learning qualities. Participants were 80 BSc students who were randomly divided over 40 dyads and assigned to two experimental conditions (worked example and scripting). An online peer feedback environment named EduTech was designed and students were tasked with writing an argumentative essay, engaging in peer feedback, and revising their essay. The results indicate that students in the scripting condition benefited more than students in the worked example condition regarding peer feedback quality. Furthermore, the scores of students in both conditions improved from pre-test to post-test in terms of argumentative essay writing and learning. This difference was significant, however, between the two conditions only with regard to argumentative essay writing favoring the scripting condition. We explain how each of these approaches can be used to improve students’ argumentative peer feedback and essay writing and learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The Power of Feedback
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 2×
“In other words, peer feedback not only leads to improvement of students’writing proficiency, but also helps them develop discipline-specific knowledge (Liu & Carless, 2006), enhance their understandings on the topic (Hattie & Timperley, 2007; Liu & Carless, 2006).”
Background
Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 · Cited by 7,776 · cited 1×
“Scientific research has shown that worked examples can facilitate problem solving processes (Kirschner et al., 2006) and the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge (Kyun et al., 2013) by reducing extraneous cognitive load which in turn lead to better learning outcomes (Sweller et al., 2011).”
Background
The Uses of Argument
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Cognitive Load Theory
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_446 · Cited by 6,172
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173
Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach.
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122 · Cited by 1,198
Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment
Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562510600680582 · Cited by 1,034
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 · Cited by 966
An introduction to reasoning
Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. S. (1979) · Cited by 923
The Evolution of Research on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_1 · Cited by 638
Exploring the Assistance Dilemma in Experiments with Cognitive Tutors
Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9049-0 · Cited by 632
Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education
Falchikov, N. (2001) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 593
Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2 · Cited by 561
Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2005) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004 · Cited by 548
Constructivist instruction : success or failure?
Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009) · Cited by 540
Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748005 · Cited by 525
Learning and Instruction
National Research Council (2003) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/10858 · Cited by 456
European Journal of Psychology of Education
(2013) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/10212.1878-5174 · Cited by 414
‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about
Wingate, U. (2011) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001 · Cited by 392
Structuring Peer Interaction to Promote High-Level Cognitive Processing
King, A. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6 · Cited by 320
Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318 · Cited by 318
Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts
Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9028-y · Cited by 265
Training Advanced Writing Skills: The Case for Deliberate Practice
Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520903213600 · Cited by 262
Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005 · Cited by 257
The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment
Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005 · Cited by 243
Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021 · Cited by 242
Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes
van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003 · Cited by 232
The Worked-Out Examples Principle in Multimedia Learning
Renkl, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.016 · Cited by 231
Measuring Knowledge to Optimize Cognitive Load Factors During Instruction.
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.558 · Cited by 219
Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom.
Carroll, W. M. (1994) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.360 · Cited by 209
Introduction to Reasoning
Krawczyk, D. C. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809285-9.00001-6 · Cited by 195
Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013 · Cited by 192
Self-citation
Promoting Argumentation Competence: Extending from First- to Second-Order Scaffolding Through Adaptive Fading
Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z · Cited by 183
Self-citation
Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay
Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002 · Cited by 176
Self-citation
Effects of different online peer-feedback approaches on students' performance skills, motivation and self-efficacy in a dance course
Hsia, L.-H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.004 · Cited by 170 · cited 1×
“…(e.g. Huisman et al., 2018), domain-specific learning (e.g. Latifi et al., 2019; Noroozi, Hatami, et al., 2018; Valero Haro et al., 2019), motivation (e.g. Hsia et al., 2016), self-efficacy (e.g. Hsia et al., 2016), and argumentative essay writing (Latifi et al., 2019; Valero Haro et al., 2019).”
Background
A Genre Description of the Argumentative Essay
Hyland, K. (1990) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/003368829002100105 · Cited by 170
Computer-Mediated Argumentative Interactions for the Co-Elaboration of Scientific Notions
Baker, M. J. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0781-7_3 · Cited by 168
Computerized Peer Assessment
Davies, P. (2000) · Innovations in Education and Training International · doi:10.1080/135580000750052955 · Cited by 162
Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process
Baker, K. M. (2016) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787416654794 · Cited by 160
Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment
Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2012) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5 · Cited by 149
How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning?
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2019) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005 · Cited by 148
Self-citation
Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment
Bacha, N. N. (2010) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.05.001 · Cited by 127
Fostering critical thinking and reflection through blog‐mediated peer feedback
Novakovich, J. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12114 · Cited by 125
Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system
Lin, G.-Y. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010 · Cited by 111 · cited 1×
“Therefore, a variety of approaches have been suggested to support students when they engage in peer feedback (see Lin, 2018; Noroozi et al., 2016; Valero Haro et al., 2019).”
Background
Perspectives on Argument
Wood, N. V. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 109
Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: does gender matter?
Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200 · Cited by 107
Self-citation
Barriers to online critical discourse
Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2007) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9007-3 · Cited by 107
Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical Stance
Mei, W. S. (2006) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688206071316 · Cited by 92
Evaluating and Selecting Counterarguments
Leitão, S. (2003) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088303257507 · Cited by 92
Prompting secondary students’ use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels during an investigative task
Gan, M. J. S., & Hattie, J. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9319-4 · Cited by 87
Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement
Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. M. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.003 · Cited by 84
Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course
Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. (2008) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562510701794050 · Cited by 81
Small‐group, computer‐mediated argumentation in middle‐school classrooms: The effects of gender and different types of online teacher guidance
Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., & Gil, J. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02030.x · Cited by 80
Students’ feedback preferences: how do students react to timely and automatically generated assessment feedback?
Bayerlein, L. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.870531 · Cited by 80
Argumentation in Higher Education: Improving Practice Through Theory and Research
Andrews, R. (2009) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 80
The Process of Composition
Reid, J. M. (1982) · Cited by 79
Increasing anonymity in peer assessment by using classroom response technology within face-to-face higher education
Raes, A., Vanderhoven, E., & Schellens, T. (2015) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.823930 · Cited by 78 · cited 1×
“Providing and receiving anonymous feedback are considered to actively engage students in the peer feedback processes and activities (Nicol et al., 2014), reduces bias in the feedback process and provide more objective feedback (Raes et al., 2015).”
Background
An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment
Chen, Y., & Tsai, C. (2009) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703290802646297 · Cited by 72
The Effect of Worked Examples When Learning to Write Essays in English Literature
Kyun, S., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2013) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.727884 · Cited by 66
The effects of an online learning environment with worked examples and peer feedback on students’ argumentative essay writing and domain-specific knowledge acquisition in the field of biotechnology
Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Exploring students’ emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: a case study
Cheng, K.-H., Hou, H.-T., & Wu, S.-Y. (2014) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.649766 · Cited by 52
Using multisource feedback in the classroom: a computer-based approach
McGourty, J. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/13.848062 · Cited by 47
Argumentation in higher education: improving practice through theory and research
Hyslop-Margison, E. J. (2011) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2011.582754 · Cited by 43
Rethinking the Argumentative Essay
Schneer, D. (2013) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.123 · Cited by 42
Peer Assessment in a Wiki: Product Improvement, Students’ Learning And Perception Regarding Peer Feedback
Gielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.450 · Cited by 39
Effects of a formative assessment script on how vocational students generate formative feedback to a peer’s or their own performance
Peters, O., Körndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0344-y · Cited by 37
Internet-Based Peer Assessment in High School Settings
Tsai, C. (2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-120-9.ch046 · Cited by 20
Teaching of social software and web 2.0
Chiazzese, G., & Chifari, A. (2012) · Italian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.17471/2499-4324/199 · Cited by 9
About Argument: Teaching and Learning Argument
Andrews, R. (1995) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 4
By the Question about the Tendencies of Technical Terminology Development in the Modern German Language (the Material of Electric and Technical Terms in German, French and Russian)
Beissembayeva, G. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.508 · Cited by 3

Research works printed but not linked: 3

10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4 · DOI · Paper page
10.3102/00346543068003249 · DOI · Paper page
Wang X.-M., 2017, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20, 58

Sorted by citations

Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student's Perspective
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296 · Cited by 418
Teacher’s Perceptions of Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Tool for Scientific Writing
Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.755914 · Cited by 298
Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback?
Banihashem, S. K., Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Moon, J., & Drachsler, H. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4 · Cited by 282
Self-citation
Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation
Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862 · Cited by 188
Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing
Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2093914 · Cited by 135
Self-citation

See all 107

Authors: Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E.
Affiliations: Kharazmi University (IR)
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
Corresponding author: Noroozi, Omid
ORCID: Latifi, Saeed
Noroozi, Omid
Talaee, Ebrahim
Venue: Interactive Learning Environments
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2020-08-01
Volume: 31
Issue: 2
Pages: 655-669
ISSN: 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
1744-5191
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032
OpenAlex: W3046276216
Cited by: 107
References: 71
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI: 16.99
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: cc-by-nc-nd
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (unspecified)
Locations: Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords: worked examples, scripting, argumentative essay writing, online peer feedback, essay revision, argumentation, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks