CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 124Populism, Right-Wing MovementsMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Economic and Symbolic Threat Appeals in Right-Wing Populist Advertising on Anti-Immigrant Attitudes: The Impact of Textual and Visual Appeals

Open access
Schmuck, Desirée, Matthes, Jörg·2017·Political Communication
DOI 10.1080/10584609.2017.1316807
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Right-wing populist parties portray immigrants as economic or symbolic threats in their political advertisements by constructing a moral divide between the “good” ordinary people and “bad” immigrants. Yet, it remains unclear how these different threat appeals contribute to the formation of anti-immigrant attitudes among citizens and what role visual elements play in producing these effects. A survey-experiment with a quota sample of 471 participants reveals that, overall, symbolic threat appeals exert stronger effects on anti-immigrant attitudes than economic ones. When presented via text alone, only symbolic—not economic—threat appeals increased anti-immigrant attitudes via the activation of heuristic processing such as the reliance on negative stereotypes or feelings of anxiety, in particular among lower-educated citizens. When visuals were present, both types of threat appeals enhanced anti-immigrant attitudes among citizens across all education levels based on heuristic processing. Additionally, high image-text congruency induced cognitive argument approval resulting in higher anti-immigrant attitudes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10584609.2017.1316807

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Ansolabehere S., 1995, Going negative: How political advertising shrinks and polarizes the electorate
  2. LeVine R. A., 1972, Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior
  3. Marquart F., 2016, International Journal of Communication, 10, 2576
  4. Pelinka A., 2013, Right-wing populism in Europe
  5. 10.4324/9780203166956_chapter_1 · DOI
  6. Tajfel H., 1978, Differentiation between social groups

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 124

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Schmuck, Desirée
ORCID
Venue
Political Communication
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-05-19
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
607-626
ISSN
  • 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7675
DOI
10.1080/10584609.2017.1316807
OpenAlex
W2615508116
Cited by
124
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
45.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Political Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
right-wing populism, political advertising, anti-immigrant sentiment, fear appeals, economic threats, symbolic threat, visual appeal, heuristic processing, stereotypes, anxiety, educational attainment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review