CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 175Misinformation and Its ImpactsMedia Influence and PoliticsNews Media Framing and Political Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

All the News That’s Fit to Click: The Economics of Clickbait Media

Munger, Kevin·2020·Political Communication
DOI 10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The news media industry has changed as the internet and social media have matured and become integral to modern life. I describe these changes through a theoretical analysis of the economic structure of the industry and explore the implications for scholars of online media and politics. The crux of my argument is that social media simultaneously serves as a distribution platform and reputation builder, as social recommendations take the place of expensive investments in high-quality journalism. This development rendered crucial portions of previous models of the market for news inaccurate due to the declining importance of firm reputation. This mechanism interacts with the massive heterogeneity in digital literacy and growing animosity toward the news media among conservatives to create “credibility cascades,” which I argue are a necessary condition for Fake News to flourish.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. DiMaggio P., 2001, Princeton: Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, 4, 4
  2. Messing S., 2012, Communication Research
  3. 10.1515/9781400865871 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Nicas J., 2016, Wall Street Journal
  5. Nielsen J., 2016, The distribution of users’ computer skills: Worse than you think
  6. Smith A., 2018, Social media use in 2018
  7. Wallenstein A., 2013, Variety

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 175

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Munger, K.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Munger, Kevin
ORCID
Munger, Kevin
Venue
Political Communication
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-12-03
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
376-397
ISSN
  • 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7675
DOI
10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626
OpenAlex
W2992434016
Cited by
175
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
24.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
Keywords
clickbait, social media, corporate reputation, news dissemination, social recommendation, digital literacy, fake news, news quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review