Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of attributed responsibility and response strategies on organizational reputation: A meta-analysis of situational crisis communication theory research

Ma, Liang, Zhan, Mengqi (Monica)·2016·Journal of Public Relations Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1062726x.2016.1166367

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. * Indicates studies that contributed data to the meta-analyses
  2. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.01.001 · DOI
  3. Benoit, W. L. (2015). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: Image repair theory and research (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  4. 10.1086/209284 · DOI · Paper page
  5. *Chen Z.-F. (2013). How publics in the United States and China respond to crisis communication strategies via social media: A cross-cultural comparative study (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Georgia Athens Georgia.
  6. 10.1177/1050651912458923 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  11. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1003_02 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1177/0021943604265607 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1300/J057v12n03_13 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/9781118335529.ch23 · DOI
  16. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr0804_04 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1304_03 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1177/089331802237233 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1202_2 · doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1202_2
  21. 10.1177/0021943603261748 · DOI · Paper page
  22. *DeGategno S. Z. (2014). Exploring how two-phase crisis response strategies influence public perceptions of an organization in a corporate social responsibility-related crisis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). American University Washington DC.
  23. 10.1002/9781444314885.ch10 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/h0086893 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/1062726X.2014.924839 · DOI
  26. *Griffin, M., Babin, B. J., & Attaway, J. S. (1991). An empirical investigation of the impact of negative public publicity on consumer attitudes and intentions. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 334–341.
  27. *Jorgensen, B. K. (1996). Components of consumer reaction to company-related mishaps: A structural equation model approach. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 346–351.
  28. 10.1080/1062726X.2013.795867 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/0146167295211007 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1704_3 · DOI
  31. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1603_1 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/03637756609375482 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1080/1553118X.2011.596870 · doi:10.1080/1553118x.2011.596870
  34. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.009 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515 · Paper page
  37. 10.1080/10627260802520496 · doi:10.1080/10627260802520496
  38. 10.1080/1062726X.2011.582207 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.02.002 · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.02.002
  40. *Visscher S. R. (2013). The effect of modality and response strategy on evaluations of credibility and reputation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri—Columbia Columbia MO.
  41. 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00557.x · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1603_4 · DOI
  43. 10.1037/1082-989X.3.1.46 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.4324/9781410615749 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.003 · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.003

Metadata

Authors
Ma, L., & Zhan, M. (.
Venue
Journal of Public Relations Research
Published
2016-03-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
102-119
ISSN
  • 1062-726X
  • 1532-754X
Cited by
186
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of attributed responsibility and response strategies on organizational reputation: A meta-analysis of situational crisis communication theory research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1062726x.2016.1166367
The paper
Ma, L., & Zhan, M. (. (2016). Effects of attributed responsibility and response strategies on organizational reputation: A meta-analysis of situational crisis communication theory research. Journal of Public Relations Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2016.1166367

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.