Cited by 9Disability Education and EmploymentOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Perceptions of the worker role among people with psychiatric disabilities: Description and investigation of associated factors

Open access
Argentzell, Elisabeth, Eklund, Mona·2013·Work

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how subjective perceptions of everyday occupations, activity level, day centre attendance, social interaction, self-mastery and clinical factors were related to how unemployed people with psychiatric disabilities (PD) envision a future worker role, also controlling for socio-demographic variables. PARTICIPANTS: 175 people with PD; 93 attended a day centre and 82 did not. Of the 93 day centre attendees 39 visited meeting place-oriented day centres and 54 attended work-oriented ones. METHODS: Self-ratings and interview-based instruments were used to assess the view of the worker role, social interaction, subjective perceptions of everyday occupations, activity level, self-mastery, and socio-demographic and clinical factors. Non-parametric statistics were used when analysing the data. RESULTS: A few aspects of the worker role seemed positively influenced by attending a day centre, in particular a work-oriented one. High levels of activity (p=0.009) and self-mastery (p=0.024), being younger (p=0.004) and having less depression (p=0.008) were also associated with a more positive view of the worker role. CONCLUSION: In order to enhance a future worker role the individual's feeling of control in the rehabilitation process should be highlighted and possibilities for general activity engagement be offered. Since the findings indicate that most aspects of the worker role were not enhanced by day centre attendance community-based care should further concentrate on promoting this future role for people with PD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-2012-1474

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Argentzell, E., & Eklund, M.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Venue
Work
Published
2013
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
289-298
ISSN
1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151527134
Cited by
9
References
47
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
psychiatric disability, worker roles, employment expectations, day centers, activity level, self-control, social interaction, depression, community-based care, rehabilitation, daily occupations, unemployed people
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Role, Work, Young Adult, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review