Cited by 18Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

An effectiveness study of a CBT group program for women with breast cancer

Beatty, Lisa, Koczwara, Bogda·2010·Clinical Psychologist

Abstract

Cognitive Behaviour Stress Management for women with breast cancer has demonstrable empirical efficacy, however its effectiveness in the applied clinical setting has not been examined to date in an Australian setting. A 10-week group program was offered to five women with early stage breast cancer. Clinical changes in distress, coping, and social support from pre-test, to post-test and 1-month follow-up are reported. Overall, the group yielded strong favourable effect sizes indicating clinical improvement over time in PTSD symptoms and social support, but strong unfavourable effect sizes in cognitive avoidance. In terms of clinical cut-offs, all women met criteria for PTSD at baseline, with two women recovering at follow-up. The two participants with highest baseline distress experienced large improvements in depression, anxiety and PTSD at post-treatment, but rebounded to baseline at follow-up. Women qualitatively reported the major benefits of the program to be acquiring skills in relaxation and cognitive restructuring, and obtaining social support. This case study provides preliminary support that a CBSM program can improve PTSD and social support, however it raises concerns regarding the deteriorations observed in cognitive avoidance. Ways of addressing cognitive avoidance and the maintenance of gains warrants further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13284207.2010.500307

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBSM seems effective in applied clinical settings with cancer patients.

    “CBSM also seems effective in applied clinical settings with cancer patients (e.g., Beatty & Koczwara, 2010).”

    From An online stress management workbook for breast cancer (2014) · cites this paper as Beatty & Koczwara, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beatty, L., & Koczwara, B.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Venue
Clinical Psychologist
Published
2010-07-01
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
45-53
ISSN
  • 1328-4207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9552
OpenAlex
W2172108684
Cited by
18
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
breast cancer, group therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological distress, coping, social support, cognitive avoidance, depression, anxiety, early breast cancer, women, maintenance of treatment gains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review