Cited by 30Digital Mental Health InterventionsCancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

‘Cancer Coping Online’: A pilot trial of a self-guided CBT internet intervention for cancer-related distress

Beatty, Lisa, Koczwara, Bogda, Wade, Tracey·2011·E-Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

While internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy (iCBT) programs for mental health conditions has a demonstrated evidence base, the application of iCBT to those experiencing cancer-related distress has not been reported. This study therefore developed and pilot tested a self-guided iCBT program for patients with early stage cancer. Cancer Coping Online is a 6-week intervention which provides information, worksheets, and activities to address commonly experienced physical, emotional, social and communication difficulties. Participants were 12 patients (11 female) recruited over a 3-month period from one public hospital. The primary outcome measures were negative affect and posttraumatic stress. The secondary outcome measures were coping styles (helplessness/hopelessness, anxious preoccupation, cognitive avoidance, fatalism and fighting spirit). Changes over time were measured using within group effect sizes (Cohen’s d), with reliable change indices (RCIs) used to assess the clinical significance of changes over time. The intervention lead to reductions in negative affect (d=0.53), helplessness/hopelessness (d=0.64), anxious preoccupation (d=0.43), and fatalism (d=0.42). These reductions were clinically significant for 33% of the sample for negative affect, and for 25% of the sample for helplessness/hopelessness and anxious preoccupation. These results indicate that an iCBT program for cancer patients can reduce distress, and warrant further investigation through a randomised controlled trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7790/ejap.v7i2.256

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beatty, L., Koczwara, B., & Wade, T.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Venue
E-Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2011-12-20
Volume
7
Issue
2
ISSN
1832-7931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033564938
Cited by
30
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
E-Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, cancer-related distress, early-stage cancer, self-guided intervention, negative affect, helplessness and hopelessness, anxious preoccupation, fatalism, coping styles, post-traumatic stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review