CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 148Face Recognition and PerceptionAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does perceived direct gaze boost detection in adults and children with and without autism? The stare-in-the-crowd effect revisited

Senju, Atsushi, Hasegawa, Toshikazu, Tojo, Yoshikuni·2005·Visual Cognition
DOI 10.1080/13506280444000797
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study extended that of von Grünau and Anston (1995) and explored whether perceived direct gaze is easily detected by individuals with and without autism, utilizing a visual-search paradigm. Participants detected target faces with either direct gaze or averted gaze. Laterally averted faces were used to eliminate the involvement of lower perceptual characteristics such as symmetry, which were inherent with the “straight gaze” used by von Grünau and Anston. Both typically developed adults and children detected targets with direct gaze more quickly than those with averted gaze, but face inversion distorted this asymmetrical performance, suggesting the contribution of configurative facial processing. In contrast, children with autism were not affected by the gaze direction presented by realistic facial stimuli. They were, however, faster to detect straight gaze defined solely by local features, which suggests that their impairment might be specific to the detection of direct gaze presented within a facial context.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13506280444000797

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Okada T., 2002, Seishin Igaku, 44, 893
  2. Raven J. C., 1956, Coloured progressive matrices
  3. Sugishita M., 1993, Japanese Raven's coloured progressive matrices

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 148

Related

Metadata

Authors
Senju, A., Hasegawa, T., & Tojo, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • National Institute of Special Education (JP)
ORCID
Senju, Atsushi
Venue
Visual Cognition
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-11
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
1474-1496
ISSN
  • 1350-6285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0716
DOI
10.1080/13506280444000797
OpenAlex
W2073302779
Cited by
148
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Visual Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
averted gaze, autism spectrum disorder, face perception, visual search, face inversion, gaze direction, children with autism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review