Cited by 9Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

BNC210: an investigational α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor modulator for the treatment of anxiety disorders

Open access
Hampsey, Elliot, Perkins, Adam, Young, Allan H.·2023·Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anxiety disorders are common, disabling psychiatric conditions associated with excessive worry, irritability, and physiological symptoms of stress. Following insufficient response to psychological therapies, first-line pharmacological treatments for anxiety disorders suffer from inconsistent efficacy, addiction, and intolerable side-effect profiles (e.g. sedation), especially when used inappropriately or contrary to evidence-based guidelines. Developing anxiolytics acting via cholinergic modulation may provide novel options for the treatment of anxiety disorders, without the drawbacks of existing anxiolytics. AREAS COVERED: We review pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders and proposed mechanisms of action in relation to the associated neural circuitry. We then consider the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of the negative-allosteric modulator of the alpha7 nicotinic receptor BNC210, an investigational anxiolytic so far employed in studies of those with social anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and agitation in hospitalized elderly. Lastly, we consider the environment of competitor compounds for this indication, and BNC210's place within it, in both the present and near-future. EXPERT OPINION: : There is a relative paucity of data regarding BNC210, albeit the small amount of mostly non-peer reviewed data indicate it is a well-tolerated, effective anxiolytic. Phase III trials are required for proper appraisal of its utility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13543784.2023.2192922

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hampsey, E., Perkins, A., & Young, A. H.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hampsey, Elliot
Venue
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
Published
2023-03-20
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
277-282
ISSN
  • 1354-3784 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7658
OpenAlex
W4327547028
Cited by
9
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, negative allosteric modulators, anxiety disorders, anxiolytics, social anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, neural circuits
MeSH terms
Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Anti-Anxiety Agents, alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review