CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 86Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingEmployee Performance and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The role of personal resources in explaining well-being and performance: A study among young veterinary professionals

Mastenbroek, N. J. J. M., Jaarsma, A. D. C., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., van Beukelen, P., Demerouti, E.·2014·European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
DOI 10.1080/1359432x.2012.728040
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examines the role of three personal resources (i.e., proactive behaviour, reflective behaviour, and self-efficacy) in the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) model in order to predict self and other ratings of performance. The sample consisted of 860 Dutch veterinary professionals and 170 colleagues. We hypothesized and found that work engagement mediates the relationship between job as well as personal resources and extrarole performance and the relationship between job resources and work engagement. Although hypothesized, we found no support for the mediating role of exhaustion in the relationship between job demands as well as personal resources and inrole performance. Moreover personal resources were directly related to in- and extrarole performance. In conclusion, the study expands the JD-R model by integrating personal resources at a behavioural level and performance measures in the model, and shows that personal resources have a mediating and initiating role in explaining work engagement and performance in young veterinary professionals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1359432x.2012.728040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A resourceful work environment is associated with employees having more personal resources.

    “A resourceful work environment is associated with employees having more personal resources, and these employees appear to be more engaged and involved more in extra-role behavior.”

    From Work engagement in health professions education (2017) · cites this paper as Mastenbroek et al. 2012

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 86

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Arbuckle J. L., 2008, AMOS 17 user's guide
  2. 10.1080/01421590701299272 · DOI
  3. Bakker A. B., 2008, Personal resources
  4. 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00030-1 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/10615800801958637 · DOI
  6. Bandura A., 1977, Psychology and life (9th ed.)
  7. Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
  8. Bandura A., 1999, The self in social psychology. Key readings in social psychology (pp. 285–298
  9. Bandura A., 2001, International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 20, pp. 13815–13820
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/occmed/kqp072 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0007-6813(99)80023-8 · DOI
  13. 10.3138/jvme.38.3.262 · DOI
  14. Carter R. L., 2006, Research and Practice in Assessment, 1, 1
  15. 10.1037/a0024004 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.532 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/a0026877 · DOI
  18. Demerouti E., 2006, Occupational health psychology: European perspectives on research, education and practice
  19. 10.1016/S0001–8791(03)00030–7 · DOI
  20. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1108/13620431011020899 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1080/00480169.2006.36623 · DOI
  24. 10.1006/jvbe.1998.1682 · DOI
  25. Gordon H. J., 2011, Manuscript submitted for publication
  26. 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Haverkamp H. J., 2006, Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde, 131, 882
  28. Hockey G. R. J., 1993, Attention: Selection, awareness, and control, 328
  29. 10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05223-4 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Hoyle R. H., 1995, Structural equation modeling, concepts, issues, and applications, 1
  31. 10.3138/jvme.35.3.431 · DOI
  32. Joreskog K. G., 1993, LISREL8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language
  33. 10.1080/0267837031000149919 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.02.003 · DOI
  35. Leiter M. P., 1993, Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research, 237
  36. 10.1177/0149206307300814 · DOI
  37. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.09.002 · DOI
  39. 10.3138/jvme.35.4.573 · DOI
  40. Meijman T. F., 1998, Handbook of work and organizational psychology: Work psychology, 5
  41. 10.2307/256798 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475 · DOI
  43. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1002/ajim.10228 · DOI
  45. Roe R. A., 1999, International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 231
  46. 10.1007/s10902-005-8854-8 · DOI
  47. 10.1177/1046496402239577 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/job.248 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1177/0013164405282471 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1002/job.595 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Schaufeli W. B., 1996, Maslach Burnout Inventory manual
  52. 10.1023/A:1015630930326 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Schaufeli W. B., 2000, De Psycholoog, 36, 9
  54. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00359.x · DOI
  55. Schön D. A., 1983, The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
  56. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240 · DOI
  58. 10.1177/008124630303300404 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/02678370601065893 · DOI · Paper page
  60. van Veldhoven M., 1994, Het meten van psychosociale arbeidsbelasting met een vragenlijst: De Vragenlijst Beleving en Beoordeling van de Arbeid (VBBA) [The measurement of psychosocial working conditions with a survey: The Questionnaire Experience and Evaluation of Work (QEEW)]
  61. Wothke W., 1998, Modeling longitudinal and multiple group data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples (pp. 219–240)
  62. 10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121 · DOI
  63. 10.1037/1076-8998.13.4.345 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Mastenbroek, N. J. J. M., Jaarsma, A. D. C., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., van Beukelen, P., & Demerouti, E.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Mastenbroek, N. J. J. M.
ORCID
Venue
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2012-10-10
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
190-202
ISSN
  • 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0643
DOI
10.1080/1359432x.2012.728040
OpenAlex
W2081875361
Cited by
86
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
personal resources, proactive behavior, self-efficacy, job demands-resources model, work engagement, exhaustion, in-role performance, extra-role performance, well-being, job demands, job resources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review