Cited by 58Nursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Impact of Role Discrepancies on Caregiver Burden Among Spouses

Savundranayagam, Marie Y., Montgomery, Rhonda J. V.·2010·Research on Aging

Abstract

Using caregiver identity theory, the authors investigated whether role discrepancies mediated the relationships between illness-related stressors (activities of daily living [ADLs] limitations and problem behaviors) and burden (stress, relationship, and objective burden) for spouse caregivers. Participants completed measures of identity standards for spouse and caregiver roles and behaviors, burden, assistance with ADLs, and problem behaviors. Structural equation modeling analyses revealed that role discrepancies completely mediated the relationships between ADLs and stress and relationship burden. Although role discrepancies mediated the relationships between problem behaviors and all forms of burden, there were direct relationships between problem behaviors and burden. Finally, participants who exceeded their relationship identity standards experienced greater burden. Supporting caregiver identity theory, the results suggest that ADL assistance is burdensome for caregivers when it highlights inconsistencies between their behaviors and their relationship expectations. However, unpredictable stressors such as problem behaviors are both inherently burdensome and highlight role discrepancies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027509351473

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregivers feel distress when they perceive themselves as exceeding the expectations of their relationship identity.

    “A study by Savundranayagam and Montgomery showed that caregivers experience distress when they perceive they are going beyond and above their expectations of the relationship identity.16”

    From The Unique Experience of Spouses in Early-Onset Dementia (2013) · cites this paper as [16]

  • The impact of role discrepancies on spouse caregiver burden has been documented.

    “The impact of such role discrepancies on spouse caregiver burden, that is, the extent to which the standards of the relationship identity are inconsistent with the behavior of spouse caregivers has been documented in the study by Savundranayagam and Montgomery.16”

    From The Unique Experience of Spouses in Early-Onset Dementia (2013) · cites this paper as [16]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savundranayagam, M. Y., & Montgomery, R. J. V.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Savundranayagam, Marie Y.
Venue
Research on Aging
Published
2009-11-13
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
175-199
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
OpenAlex
W2019506619
Cited by
58
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
caregiver burden, spousal caregivers, activities of daily living, behavioral problems, stress burden, objective burden, identity standards, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review