Cited by 9Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

To pay attention or not: The associations between attentional bias towards negative emotional information and anxiety, guilt feelings, and experiential avoidance in dementia family caregivers

Open access
Cabrera, Isabel, Márquez-González, María, Gallego-Alberto, Laura, Pedroso-Chaparro, María del Sequeros, Barrera-Caballero, Samara, Losada, Andrés·2022·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

Caring for a relative with dementia has been linked to negative consequences for caregivers' psychological health, such as anxiety or guilt. Cognitive theories of psychopathology propose that attentional bias towards negative stimuli contribute to the development and maintenance of emotional disorders and clinical symptomatology. However, attentional bias has scarcely been explored in dementia family caregivers. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between attentional bias and anxiety symptomatology, guilt feelings, and experiential avoidance in a sample of dementia family caregivers. Participants were 226 dementia family caregivers. Attentional bias was measured using a novel priming adaptation of the dot-probe task. The sample was divided into high and low anxiety symptomatology, guilt feelings, and experiential avoidance groups. The results revealed two opposite patterns of emotional information processing in dementia family caregivers. While anxiety was found to be associated with an attentional preference for negative information, experiential avoidance was related to attentional avoidance of this information. Although guilt was also related to an attentional preference for negative information, this relationship was no longer significant when controlling for anxiety levels. These inflexible attentional patterns may have negative clinical consequences, given that in both cases relevant information necessary for adaptive coping with the stressful situation of caregiving may be unattended to or omitted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2021.1871883

Cites

46 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cabrera, I., Márquez-González, M., Gallego-Alberto, L., Pedroso-Chaparro, M. D. S., Barrera-Caballero, S., & Losada, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
  • Department of Biological and Health Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Corresponding author
Cabrera, Isabel
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2021-01-13
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
328-336
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W3118947897
Cited by
9
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) (submittedVersion)
  • BURJC Digital (King Juan Carlos University) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Comunidad de Madrid
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PSI2015-65152-C2-2-R, PSI 2015-65152-C2-1-R)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
attentional bias, anxiety, guilt, experiential avoidance, dot-probe task, priming, emotional processing, caregiver stress
MeSH terms
Attentional Bias, Anxiety, Dementia, Emotions, Guilt, Humans, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review