Cited by 410Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

A systematic review of the prevalence and covariates of anxiety in caregivers of people with dementia

Open access
Cooper, Claudia, Balamurali, T.B.S., Livingston, Gill·2007·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Caregiving for people with dementia has consistently been linked with psychological problems, usually in terms of caregiver burden, general psychological distress and depressive symptomatology, while morbidity due to anxiety has been relatively neglected in this group. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature, searching electronic databases, reference lists, relevant systematic reviews and contacting experts in the field. We used Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) criteria for inclusion and rating the validity of all studies that reported (1) the prevalence, predictors and covariates of anxiety disorders or anxiety caseness, and (2) covariates and predictors of the level of anxiety symptoms. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies met our inclusion criteria. Clinically, significant anxiety affects about a quarter of caregivers for people with dementia and was more common than in matched controls. Such caregivers have higher anxiety levels than controls, and that confrontative and escape avoidance coping, caregiver burden and poorer caregiver physical health are factors associated with higher anxiety levels from cross-sectional studies. CONCLUSIONS: Coping style may be more associated with anxiety than depression while other covariates (burden and poor physical health) are similar to those for caregiver depression. We found no conclusive evidence about factors associated with anxiety disorders or predicting anxiety from longitudinal studies. Neither care recipient cognition nor ADL impairment; nor caregiver age nor duration of caring are associated with caregiver anxiety levels. Good quality cohort studies are needed to determine whether these factors also predict anxiety disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610206004297

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, C., Balamurali, T. B. S., & Livingston, G.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
175-195
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978338051
Cited by
410
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
dementia caregivers, caregiver anxiety, anxiety prevalence, risk factors for anxiety, coping styles, escape-avoidance, caregiver burden, caregiver physical health, caregiver depression, activities of daily living
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Prevalence, Caregivers, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review