Cited by 7Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Does Avoiding Distressing Thoughts and Feelings Influence the Relationship between Carer Subjective Burden and Anxiety Symptoms in Family Carers of People with Dementia?

Open access
Van Hout, Elien, Contreras, Milena L, Mioshi, Eneida, Kishita, Naoko·2023·Journal of Applied Gerontology

Abstract

Anxiety remains understudied in family carers of people with dementia. Understanding factors that moderate the relationship between stressors and anxiety symptoms in this population is critical to inform interventions. This study examined whether generic experiential avoidance (AAQ-II) and experiential avoidance specific to caregiving-related thoughts and feelings (EACQ) moderate the relationship between subjective burden (ZBI-12) and anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) in carers of people with dementia. The first model ( R 2 = .66, ∆R 2 = .03) exploring the moderating effect of AAQ-II demonstrated a significant interaction term between AAQ-II and subjective burden. The second model ( R 2 = .53, ∆R 2 = .03), exploring the moderating effect of EACQ, demonstrated a significant interaction term between EACQ and subjective burden. These results provide evidence that carers with higher levels of experiential avoidance may be particularly prone to the negative effect of subjective burden on anxiety symptoms. Clinical implications for assessment of experiential avoidance and its treatment in carers of people with dementia are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/07334648231156858

Cites

38 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies within dementia caregiving have separately investigated mediating roles of experiential avoidance or cognitive fusion in the association between caregiving stressors and mental health outcomes.

    “Previous studies within dementia caregiving have separately investigated mediating roles of experiential avoidance or cognitive fusion in the association between caregiving stressors and mental health outcomes (Barrera- Caballero et al., 2021; Mausbach et al., 2012; Van Hout et al., 2023).”

    From The role of experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion in the development of anxiety symptoms among family carers of people with dementia (2024) · cites this paper as Van Hout et al., 2023

    The Abstract and Introduction say Van Hout et al. examined whether experiential avoidance *moderates* the relationship between carer subjective burden and anxiety symptoms, not whether it mediates that relationship. The Discussion proposes studying cognitive fusion in future work rather than reporting a caregiving analysis of it. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increased caregiver subjective burden has been linked to augmented levels of experiential avoidance in previous literature.

    “which has been linked to augmented levels of experiential avoidance in previous literature (Van Hout et al., 2023).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Alzheimer’s Society. (2014). Dementia UK: 2014 edition. Alzheimer’s Society.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Hout, E., Contreras, M. L., Mioshi, E., & Kishita, N.
Affiliations
  • School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Kishita, Naoko
Venue
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Published
2023-02-09
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
1760-1769
ISSN
  • 0733-4648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4523
OpenAlex
W4319821915
Cited by
7
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Gerontology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0418-20001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
experiential avoidance, family caregivers, dementia, subjective burden, anxiety symptoms, moderating effect, caregiver stress, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, Zarit Burden Interview, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
MeSH terms
Optimism, Anxiety, Dementia, Emotions, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review