The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social networks and Internet connectivity effects
Abstract
This paper explores the impact of communication media and the Internet on connectivity between people. Results from a series of social network studies of media use are used as background for exploration of these impacts. These studies explored the use of all available media among members of an academic research group and among distance learners. Asking about media use as well as about the strength of the tie between communicating pairs revealed that those more strongly tied used more media to communicate than weak ties, and that media use within groups conformed to a unidimensional scale, showing a configuration of different tiers of media use supporting social networks of different ties strengths. These results lead to a number of implications regarding media and Internet connectivity, including: how media use can be added to characteristics of social network ties; how introducing a medium can create latent tie connectivity among group members that provides the technical means for activating weak ties, and also how a change in a medium can disrupt existing weak tie networks; how the tiers of media use also suggest that certain media support different kinds of information flow; and the importance of organization-level decisions about what media to provide and promote. The paper concludes with a discussion of implications for Internet effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet: Reconciling Conflicting Findings
NIE, N. H. (2001) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027640121957277 · Cited by 803
Cited by
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis.
Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002 · Cited by 1,919
Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810385389 · Cited by 1,349
Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review
Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12033 · Cited by 1,209
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078 · Cited by 916
Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M. R., Turner McGowen, S. E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J. A., et al. (2015) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/disa.12092 · Cited by 869
Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-018-0261-x · Cited by 712
“Media multiplexity theory posits that strong tie relationships, or individuals who are closer, exhibit greater “multimodality,” or communication via a larger number of media channels (Haythornthwaite 2005).”
Manago, A. M., Taylor, T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026338 · Cited by 657
Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp
Waterloo, S. F., Baumgartner, S. E., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817707349 · Cited by 549
Tufekci, Z. (2008) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/13691180801999050 · Cited by 523
Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks
Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439880902923580 · Cited by 456
Ambient co-presence: transnational family practices in polymedia environments
MADIANOU, M. (2016) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12105 · Cited by 445
Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Mao, Y., & Swafford, B. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210365537 · Cited by 346
A meta-analysis of social networking online and social capital
Liu, D., Ainsworth, S. E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2016) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000091 · Cited by 205
Lu, W., & Hampton, K. N. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815621514 · Cited by 204
Measuring Online Communication Attitude: Instrument Development and Validation
Ledbetter, A. M. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903300262 · Cited by 133
A meta-analysis of social network site use and social support
Liu, D., Wright, K. B., & Hu, B. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.024 · Cited by 127
Balki, E., Hayes, N., & Holland, C. (2022) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/40125 · Cited by 132
Park, J., Lee, D. S., Shablack, H., Verduyn, P., Deldin, P., Ybarra, O., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.048 · Cited by 104
Torres, R., Gerhart, N., & Negahban, A. (2018) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3242734.3242740 · Cited by 113
El efecto de las TIC y redes sociales en estudiantes universitarios
Maldonado Berea, G. A., García González, J., & Sampedro Requena, B. E. (2019) · RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia · doi:10.5944/ried.22.2.23178 · Cited by 68
Yue, Z., Zhang, R., & Xiao, J. (2024) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075231188185 · Cited by 58
Manago, A. M., Brown, G., Lawley, K. A., & Anderson, G. (2020) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000851 · Cited by 56
Facebook Groups as a Powerful and Dynamic Tool in Medical Education: Mixed-Method Study
Nicolai, L., Schmidbauer, M., Gradel, M., Ferch, S., Antón, S., Hoppe, B., Pander, T., von der Borch, P., Pinilla, S., Fischer, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7990 · Cited by 56
Lai, C., Chib, A., & Ling, R. (2018) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/disa.12279 · Cited by 44
Customizations and Expression Breakdowns in Ecosystems of Communication Apps
Griggio, C. F., McGrenere, J., & Mackay, W. E. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359128 · Cited by 30
Discriminatory expressions, the young and social networks: The effect of gender
Dueñas-Cid, D., Pontón-Merino, P., Belzunegui-Eraso, Á., & Pastor-Gosálbez, I. (2016) · Comunicar · doi:10.3916/c46-2016-07 · Cited by 22
College Students’ Perceptions of Communication Technology Use and Parent–Child Relationships
McCurdy, A. L., Benito-Gomez, M., Lee, G. Y., & Fletcher, A. C. (2022) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/21676968211060954 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Haythornthwaite, C.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-147
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2039688301
- Cited by
- 1,315
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.