Cited by 133Technology Use by Older AdultsHealth disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and Disability

Effectiveness of Technology Interventions in Addressing Social Isolation, Connectedness, and Loneliness in Older Adults: Systematic Umbrella Review

Open access
Balki, Eric, Hayes, Niall, Holland, Carol·2022·JMIR Aging

Abstract

Background: The global population of older adults (aged >60 years) is expected to triple to 2 billion by 2050. Proportionate rises in older adults affected by loneliness and social isolation (or social connectedness) are expected. Rapid deployability and social changes have increased the availability of technological devices, creating new opportunities for older adults. Objective: This study aimed to identify, synthesize, and critically appraise the effectiveness of technology interventions improving social connectedness in older adults by assessing the quality of reviews, common observations, and derivable themes. Methods: Following the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), 4 databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE) were searched between February 2020 and March 2022. We identified reviews with adults aged ≥50 years in community and residential settings, reporting outcomes related to the impact of technologies on social disconnectedness with inclusion criteria based on the population, intervention, context, outcomes, and study schema—review-type articles (systematic, meta-analyses, integrative, and scoping)—and with digital interventions included. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to measure the strength of outcome recommendations including the risk of bias. The reviews covered 326 primary studies with 79,538 participants. Findings were extracted, synthesized, and organized according to emerging themes. Results: Overall, 972 publications met the initial search criteria, and 24 met our inclusion criteria. Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews was used to assess the quality of the analysis. Eligible reviews (3/24, 12%) were excluded because of their low Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews scores (<22). The included reviews were dedicated to information and communications technology (ICT; 11/24, 46%), videoconferencing (4/24, 17%), computer or internet training (3/24, 12%), telecare (2/24, 8%), social networking sites (2/24, 8%), and robotics (2/27, 8%). Although technology was found to improve social connectedness, its effectiveness depended on study design and is improved by shorter durations, longer training times, and the facilitation of existing relationships. ICT and videoconferencing showed the best results, followed by computer training. Social networking sites achieved mixed results. Robotics and augmented reality showed promising results but lacked sufficient data for informed conclusions. The overall quality of the studies based on GRADE was medium low to very low. Conclusions: Technology interventions can improve social connectedness in older adults. The specific effectiveness rates favor ICT and videoconferencing, but with limited evidence, as indicated by low GRADE ratings. Future intervention and study design guidelines should carefully assess the methodological quality of studies and the overall certainty of specific outcome measures. The lack of randomized controlled trials in underlying primary studies (<28%) and suboptimal methodologies limited our findings. Robotics and augmented or virtual reality warrant further research. Low GRADE scores highlight the need for high-quality research in these areas. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022363475; https://tinyurl.com/mdd6zds

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/40125

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent reviews from 2022 have continued to focus on the effectiveness and outcomes of digital interventions in healthy ageing.

    “In recent work from 2022, reviews on this area have continued to focus on the effectiveness and outcomes of digital interventions in healthy ageing (Balki et al., 2022;Chu et al., 2022;Liu et al., 2022;Margrett et al., 2022;Suleiman-Martos et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [33]Bornemann R The impact of information and communication technology (ICT) usage on social isolation including loneliness in older adults: a systematic review Stendal University of Applied Sciences 2014 2022-10-06 Magdeburg, Germany Stendal University of Applied Sciences https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316740931_The_impact_of_information_and_communication_technology_ICT_usage_on_social_isolation_including_loneliness_in_older_adults_A_systematic_review
  2. [49]Gurrutxaga-Lerma O Interventions to prevent loneliness in older adults living in nursing homes Universidad de Navarra 2021 2022-10-06 https://hdl.handle.net/10171/62658

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balki, E., Hayes, N., & Holland, C.
Affiliations
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Balki, Eric
Venue
JMIR Aging
Published
2022-10-24
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
e40125
ISSN
2561-7605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295419463
Cited by
132
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
social connectedness, loneliness, social isolation, older adults, digital interventions, information and communication technologies, videoconferencing, computer training, telecare, social networking sites, social robots, augmented reality, virtual reality, telemedicine, digital divide, community-dwelling older adults, systematic review quality, GRADE

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review