Cited by 58Impact of Technology on AdolescentsCOVID-19 and Mental HealthCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Social media use, perceived social support, and well-being: Evidence from two waves of surveys peri- and post-COVID-19 lockdown

Open access
Yue, Zhiying, Zhang, Renwen, Xiao, Jun·2024·Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Abstract

Numerous studies have suggested that active social media use can promote well-being by enhancing perceived social support. However, the relationship between social media use and perceived social support remains inconsistent across studies. This study explores possible mechanisms underlying the relationship between active social media use, perceived social support, and well-being during and after a COVID-19 lockdown. Using online surveys with Chinese participants during ( N = 1,131) and after ( N = 407) the lockdown period, our findings support a sequential mediation model. Specifically, active social media use was positively associated with perceived online network responsiveness, which in turn, predicted augmented perceived social support. Ultimately, increased social support was linked to reduced loneliness and increased life satisfaction. These findings were consistent both during and after the lockdown, indicating that social media has the potential to complement offline social interactions and effectively fulfill individuals’ social needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/02654075231188185

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [52]52. Xiao, J., Hu, W., & Dong, Q. (2020). Collective actions among Wuhan residents during the outbreak of COVID-19. Global Journal of Media Studies, 7(1), 152-168.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yue, Z., Zhang, R., & Xiao, J.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yue, Zhiying
Venue
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2023-07-08
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
1279-1297
ISSN
  • 0265-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3608
OpenAlex
W4383621837
Cited by
58
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2
FWCI
24.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
social media use, perceived social support, well-being, COVID-19 lockdown, loneliness, life satisfaction, serial mediation, social needs, Chinese participants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review