The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organization in the crowd: peer production in large-scale networked protests
Open accessAbstract
How is crowd organization produced? How are crowd-enabled networks activated, structured, and maintained in the absence of recognized leaders, common goals, or conventional organization, issue framing, and action coordination? We develop an analytical framework for examining the organizational processes of crowd-enabled connective action such as was found in the Arab Spring, the 15-M in Spain, and Occupy Wall Street. The analysis points to three elemental modes of peer production that operate together to create organization in crowds: the production, curation, and dynamic integration of various types of information content and other resources that become distributed and utilized across the crowd. Whereas other peer-production communities such as open-source software developers or Wikipedia typically evolve more highly structured participation environments, crowds create organization through packaging these elemental peer-production mechanisms to achieve various kinds of work. The workings of these ‘production packages’ are illustrated with a theory-driven analysis of Twitter data from the 2011–2012 US Occupy movement, using an archive of some 60 million tweets. This analysis shows how the Occupy crowd produced various organizational routines, and how the different production mechanisms were nested in each other to create relatively complex organizational results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Ostrom, E. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807763 · Cited by 20,653
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.
Sufrin, S. C., & Olson, M. (1966) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521228 · Cited by 11,518
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 10,806
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
Benkler, Y. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300127232 · Cited by 3,680
Neither market nor hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization
Milošević, D. (2014) · Cited by 3,446
(2006) · BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · Cited by 3,173
THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.670661 · Cited by 3,116
Self-citation
Cited by
Gerbaudo, P., & Treré, E. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1043319 · Cited by 375
Hannah-Moffat, K. (2019) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480618763582 · Cited by 236
Contemporary Social Movements in a Hybrid Media Environment
Caren, N., Andrews, K. T., & Lu, T. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054627 · Cited by 108
Elites Tweet to Get Feet Off the Streets: Measuring Regime Social Media Strategies During Protest
Munger, K., Bonneau, R., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2019) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.3 · Cited by 84
Social Media for Social Good or Evil: An Introduction
Hemsley, J., Jacobson, J., Gruzd, A., & Mai, P. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118786719 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-28
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 232-260
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2052644524
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 94.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organization in the crowd: peer production in large-scale networked protests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1369118x.2013.870379
- The paper
- Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2013.870379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.