Cited by 181Cognitive Functions and MemoryMemory Processes and InfluencesAging and Gerontology Research

Self-Efficacy and Memory Aging: The Impact of a Memory Intervention Based on Self-Efficacy

West, Robin L., Bagwell, Dana K., Dark-Freudeman, Alissa·2008·Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition

Abstract

A multifactorial training program was developed for older adults, to improve self-efficacy and memory performance. Elements designed to raise self-efficacy were integrated into class discussions, homework readings, and practice exercises, including an emphasis on memory potential at any age, self-set goals, and opportunities for mastery. Strategy training focused on association, organization, attention, imagery, and PQRST. Significant improvements for the training group, as compared to a wait-list control group, were observed for memory self-efficacy, locus of control, name recall and story recall. Trained participants were using effective strategies more so than the control group. Final test scores were predicted by self-efficacy, condition assignment, and baseline ability (with some variation across the three tasks). These findings suggest that an integrated and comprehensive training program that incorporates principles of self-efficacy theory has great potential for improving older adults' memory ability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13825580701440510

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • West, Bagwell, and Dark-Freudeman (2008) found that an intervention targeting negative age stereotypes and promoting self-efficacy, combined with strategy training, improved older adults' memory performance.

    “Recently, West, Bagwell, and Dark-Freudeman (2008) showed that an intervention that targeted negative age stereotypes and promoted self-efficacy-combined with strategy training-had beneficial effects on older adults' memory performance.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
West, R. L., Bagwell, D. K., & Dark-Freudeman, A.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
West, Robin L.
Venue
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
Published
2008-04-28
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
302-329
ISSN
  • 0928-9917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1382-5585
  • 1744-4128
OpenAlex
W2030368401
Cited by
181
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
18.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Retirement Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
self-efficacy, memory aging, older adults, memory interventions, strategy training, locus of control, self-set goals, mastery experiences, name recall, story recall, cognitive training
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Teaching, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review