Cited by 211Cognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Improving Memory and Control Beliefs Through Cognitive Restructuring and Self-generated Strategies

Lachman, M. E., Weaver, S. L., Bandura, M., Elliot, E., Lewkowicz, C. J.·1992·Journal of Gerontology

Abstract

Memory problems are a major source of concern among older adults. The goal of this research was to evaluate methods for improving memory performance and beliefs about memory ability and control. Men and women between the ages of 60 and 85 were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: (1) cognitive restructuring to promote adaptive beliefs about memory, (2) memory skills training, (3) combined cognitive restructuring and memory skills training, (4) practice on memory tasks, and (5) a no-contact control group. Beliefs about memory (ability and control) and memory performance (working memory, recall of text materials, categorizable word list, and names and faces) were assessed at a pretest and two posttests. As predicted, those receiving the combined treatment showed the greatest increases in their sense of control and perceived ability to improve memory. Results indicated that all groups improved equally on the memory tasks, although those who had received memory training were more likely to report at the second posttest that they had begun using new strategies for remembering things.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronj/47.5.p293

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Belief-restructuring approaches alone have not been shown to maintain training benefits.

    “Belief-restructuring approaches on their own have not been shown to produce maintenance of training benefits (e.g., Lachman, Weaver, Bandura, Elliott, & Lewkowicz, 1992)”
  • The expectancy towards one's own cognitive performance and cognitive competence can be improved by cognitive restructuring, e.g., during psychotherapeutic sessions, and psychoeducation by changing beliefs and attitudes about experienced memory impairment.

    “The expectancy towards one’s own cognitive performance and cognitive competence can be improved by cognitive restructuring, e.g., during psychotherapeutic sessions, and psychoeducation by changing beliefs and attitudes about experienced memory impairment [33, 74].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lachman, M. E., Weaver, S. L., Bandura, M., Elliot, E., & Lewkowicz, C. J.
Affiliations
Brandeis University (US)
Venue
Journal of Gerontology
Published
1992-09-01
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
P293-P299
ISSN
0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2313887247
Cited by
209
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag007790-03)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-07790)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
cognitive restructuring, memory training, older adults, memory beliefs, perceived control, perceived competence, working memory, memory retrieval, face recognition (cognition), memory strategies, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude, Cognition, Education, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Motivation, Mental Recall, Self Concept, Teaching, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review