Cited by 180Cognitive Functions and MemoryMemory Processes and InfluencesAging and Gerontology Research

On the mechanisms of plasticity in young and older adults after instruction in the method of loci: Evidence for an amplification model.

Verhaeghen, Paul, Marcoen, Alfons·1996·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

A meta-analytic review of the literature points out that young adults benefit more from instruction in mnemonic techniques than do older adults. In a study on memory plasticity after instruction in the method of loci, it was found that the cognitive mechanisms of plasticity in young and older adults are largely identical, with the age-related variables of speed of mental operations, associative memory, and number of list rehearsals as the core influences on plasticity. The data fit an amplification model of plasticity, in which variables positively associated with pretest performance and negatively associated with age are positively related to plasticity. Also, older adults were found to comply less with instructions, and when complying, to apply the method of loci correctly less often. Noncompliance, incorrect strategy use, and amplification might explain the adult age differences in treatment gain after instruction in a mnemonic technique.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.164

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verhaeghen, P., & Marcoen, A.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
1996-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
164-178
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W1999006480
Cited by
180
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
method of loci, memory plasticity, mnemonic strategies, age differences, older adults, young adults, associative memory, treatment gains
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Aptitude, Association Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Practice, Psychological, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review