The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recollection Training and Transfer Effects in Older Adults: Successful Use of a Repetition-Lag Procedure
Abstract
We examined an approach aimed at training consciously-controlled recollection, introduced by Jennings and Jacoby (2003) Jennings, J. M. and Jacoby, L. L. 2003. Improving memory in older adults: Training recollection. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13: 417–440. [CSA][CROSSREF][Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], for its ability to replicate and generalize. A continuous recognition task, requiring recollection to identify the occurrence of repeated items over gradually increasing lag intervals (number of intervening items between the first and second presentation of a repeated word), was given to a group of older adults twice a week for three weeks. Pre-and-post training performance was assessed on multiple measures and compared with a recognition practice and no contact control group. Recollection training proved successful; accurate identification of repeated items increased across a lag interval of 2 to 18 intervening items. Post-training gains following recollection training were found on n-back, self-ordered pointing, source discrimination and digit symbol substitution, but not with reading span or the CVLT-II. No changes were identified in the other groups. Gains from recollection training seem to transfer successfully in older adults.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Jennings et al. (2005) showed transfer from recollection training in this paradigm to performance on other classes of memory task that are prone to proactive interference and requirements to weigh competing information”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Jennings et al., 2005
In the citing paper
“Jennings et al. (2005) showed transfer of training in their memory-control task to other memory tasks in which the same control processes were relevant to performance.”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Jennings et al., 2005
In the citing paper
“It is also the case, with a few notable exceptions (e.g., Bherer et al., 2006; Edwards et al., 2002; Jennings et al., 2005; Kramer, Larish, et al., 1999; Stuss et al., 2007; Willis et al., 2006), that transfer-of-training effects are relatively narrow.”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Jennings et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 · Cited by 3,840
A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory
Jacoby, L. L. (1991) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(91)90025-f · Cited by 3,817
Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.
Mandler, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.87.3.252 · Cited by 2,847
Automatic and effortful processes in memory.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.356 · Cited by 2,812
The teacher's word book of 30,000 words.
Witty, P. A. (1945) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0050354 · Cited by 2,675
The Teacher's Word Book of 30, 000 Words
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. D. (2018) · Cited by 2,656
Effects of Cognitive Training Interventions With Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmers, K. F., Jobe, J. B., Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, M., Morris, J. N., Rebok, G. W., Smith, D. M., Tennstedt, S. L., et al. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.18.2271 · Cited by 2,049
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1037/0882-7974.4.4.500 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0882-7974.12.1.150 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.27.5.1131 · DOI
- Jacoby L. L., 1996, Basic and applied memory research: Theory in context, 1, 161
- Jacoby L. L., 1997, Scientific Approaches to the Question of Consciousness, 13
- 10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.283 · DOI
- 10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.352 · DOI
- Jennings, J. M., Webster, L. M., Kleykamp, B. A. and Dagenbach, D. 2002. Executive function training in older adults I: Replication and generalization of a recollection training procedure. Poster session presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference. April2002, Atlanta, GA.
- Wechsler D., 1981, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Manual
- 10.1037/0882-7974.5.1.133 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding
Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656 · Cited by 2,790
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495
A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity
Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., & Schmiedek, F. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0020080 · Cited by 731
Karbach, J., & Kray, J. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00846.x · Cited by 694
Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Kueider‐Paisley, A., Parisi, J. M., Gross, A. L., & Rebok, G. W. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040588 · Cited by 728
Metadata
- Authors
- Jennings, J. M., Webster, L. M., Kleykamp, B. A., & Dagenbach, D.
- Affiliations
- Wake Forest University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jennings, Janine M.
- Venue
- Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 278-298
- ISSN
- 0928-9917 (ISSN-L)
- 1382-5585
- 1744-4128
- OpenAlex
- W2004434619
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wake Forest University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- older adults, recognition memory, N-back, source monitoring, digit symbol substitution, reading span
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Practice, Psychological, Mental Recall, Transfer, Psychology, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
