CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 115Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recollection Training and Transfer Effects in Older Adults: Successful Use of a Repetition-Lag Procedure

Jennings, Janine M., Webster, Lauren M., Kleykamp, Bethea A., Dagenbach, Dale·2005·Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
DOI 10.1080/138255890968312
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We examined an approach aimed at training consciously-controlled recollection, introduced by Jennings and Jacoby (2003) Jennings, J. M. and Jacoby, L. L. 2003. Improving memory in older adults: Training recollection. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13: 417–440. [CSA][CROSSREF][Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], for its ability to replicate and generalize. A continuous recognition task, requiring recollection to identify the occurrence of repeated items over gradually increasing lag intervals (number of intervening items between the first and second presentation of a repeated word), was given to a group of older adults twice a week for three weeks. Pre-and-post training performance was assessed on multiple measures and compared with a recognition practice and no contact control group. Recollection training proved successful; accurate identification of repeated items increased across a lag interval of 2 to 18 intervening items. Post-training gains following recollection training were found on n-back, self-ordered pointing, source discrimination and digit symbol substitution, but not with reading span or the CVLT-II. No changes were identified in the other groups. Gains from recollection training seem to transfer successfully in older adults.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/138255890968312

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1037/0882-7974.4.4.500 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0882-7974.12.1.150 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0278-7393.27.5.1131 · DOI
  4. Jacoby L. L., 1996, Basic and applied memory research: Theory in context, 1, 161
  5. Jacoby L. L., 1997, Scientific Approaches to the Question of Consciousness, 13
  6. 10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.283 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.352 · DOI
  8. Jennings, J. M., Webster, L. M., Kleykamp, B. A. and Dagenbach, D. 2002. Executive function training in older adults I: Replication and generalization of a recollection training procedure. Poster session presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference. April2002, Atlanta, GA.
  9. Wechsler D., 1981, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Manual
  10. 10.1037/0882-7974.5.1.133 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 115

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jennings, J. M., Webster, L. M., Kleykamp, B. A., & Dagenbach, D.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University (US)
Corresponding author
Jennings, Janine M.
ORCID
Venue
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
278-298
ISSN
  • 0928-9917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1382-5585
  • 1744-4128
DOI
10.1080/138255890968312
OpenAlex
W2004434619
Cited by
115
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wake Forest University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
older adults, recognition memory, N-back, source monitoring, digit symbol substitution, reading span
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Practice, Psychological, Mental Recall, Transfer, Psychology, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review