Cited by 801Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 177 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of abstinence from tobacco: Valid symptoms and time course

Hughes, John·2007·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

This article updates a 1990 review of the effects of tobacco abstinence by reviewing (a) which symptoms are valid indicators of tobacco abstinence and (b) the time course of tobacco abstinence symptoms. The author searched several databases to locate more than 3,500 citations on tobacco abstinence effects between 1990 and 2004; 120 of these were used in this review. Data collection and interpretation were based solely on the author's subjective judgments. For brevity, the review does not evaluate craving, hunger, performance, and several other possible outcomes as withdrawal symptoms. Anger, anxiety, depression, difficulty concentrating, impatience, insomnia, and restlessness are valid withdrawal symptoms that peak within the first week and last 2-4 weeks. Constipation, cough, dizziness, increased dreaming, and mouth ulcers may be abstinence effects. Drowsiness, fatigue, and several physical symptoms are not abstinence effects. In conclusion, no major changes are suggested for DSM-IV criteria for tobacco/nicotine withdrawal, but some deletions are suggested for ICD-10 criteria. Future studies need to investigate several possible new symptoms of withdrawal and to define more clearly the time course of symptoms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14622200701188919

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 177 references

37 of the 177 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 782

Metadata

Authors
Hughes, J.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Hughes, John
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2007-03
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
315-327
ISSN
1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054388960
Cited by
801
References
177
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 46
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA000490)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
smoking abstinence, nicotine withdrawal symptoms, anger, anxiety, depression, insomnia, restlessness, constipation, cough, dizziness, oral ulcers
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Nicotine, Psychomotor Agitation, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Tobacco Use Disorder, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review