The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mindfulness, by any other name…: trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science
Abstract
The Buddhist construct of mindfulness is a central element of mindfulness-based interventions and derives from a systematic phenomenological programme developed over several millennia to investigate subjective experience. Enthusiasm for ‘mindfulness’ in Western psychological and other science has resulted in proliferation of definitions, operationalizations and self-report inventories that purport to measure mindful awareness as a trait. This paper addresses a number of seemingly intractable issues regarding current attempts to characterize mindfulness and also highlights a number of vulnerabilities in this domain that may lead to denaturing, distortion, dilution or reification of Buddhist constructs related to mindfulness. Enriching positivist Western psychological paradigms with a detailed and complex Buddhist phenomenology of the mind may require greater study and long-term direct practice of insight meditation than is currently common among psychologists and other scientists. Pursuit of such an approach would seem a necessary precondition for attempts to characterize and quantify mindfulness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The nature of self-report measures of dispositional mindfulness may also distort the true nature of the relations between these constructs (Bergomi, Tschacher, & Kupper, 2013; Grossman & Van Dam, 2011).”
From Exploring Gender Differences in the Relationship Between Dispositional Mindfulness and Compulsive Sexual Behavior Among Adults in Residential Substance Use Treatment (2019) · cites this paper as Grossman & Van Dam, 2011
In the citing paper
“Grossman and Van Dam (2011) emphasised that questionnaires used to measure mindfulness may reflect a lack of mindfulness-that is, mindlessness and unawareness.”
From A Mindfulness-Based Intervention: Differential Effects on Affective and Processual Evolution (2018) · cites this paper as Grossman & Van Dam, 2011
In the citing paper
“Finally, there are inherent limitations associated with the use of self-report questionnaires, particularly in the measurement of mindfulness, where it is not clear whether an individual can accurately report their own level of mindfulness (Grossman and van Dam 2011).”
From Development and Validation of the Equanimity Scale-16 (2021) · cites this paper as Grossman and van Dam 2011
In the citing paper
“In addition, it has been suggested that a certain level of mindfulness is required for people to report mindfulness accurately. Accordingly, if individuals are not aware of their inattention or reactivity, they are unlikely to report it accurately [12].”
From Self-Reported Trait Mindfulness and Affective Reactivity: A Motivational Approach Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Further, it has been suggested that the entire construct of trait mindfulness is problematic. Grossman and Van Dam [12] cite Buddhist texts to suggest that mindfulness is better characterized as a state or process, rather than a trait.”
From Self-Reported Trait Mindfulness and Affective Reactivity: A Motivational Approach Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, there has been much debate about whether the self-reported trait mindfulness scales, such as the MAAS and FFMQ, are actually measuring mindfulness [12].”
From Self-Reported Trait Mindfulness and Affective Reactivity: A Motivational Approach Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures (2015) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 · Cited by 13,448
Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg016 · Cited by 8,615 · cited 2×
“Within this perspective, the teacher (and perhaps even the therapist and researcher) will be unable to address what he, himself, has not yet explored (Kabat-Zinn 2003; Segal et al. 2002).”
BackgroundMindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy/bpg016 · Cited by 8,612
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191105283504 · Cited by 7,511 · cited 9×
“…Ryan 2003) to how well they believe they can express themselves in words (‘Describing’ subscale, of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [FFMQ], Baer et al. 2006), but also includes self-attributions of nonjudgmental attitudes, openness to experience, attention to the present moment, and…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential(2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,477
(1993) · Cited by 7,136
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder
Cary, G. L. (1994) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1994.48.1.155 · Cited by 6,299
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Rosch, E. H., & Thompson, E. T. (2017) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 5,910
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Rosch, E., & Thompson, E. (1991) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001 · Cited by 5,765
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., Walsh, E., Duggan, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191107313003 · Cited by 2,930
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Bodhi B., 2000, The connected discourses of the Buddha: A new translation of the Samyutta Nikaya
- Buchheld N., 2001, Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, 1, 11
- Hanh T. N., 1998, The heart of the Buddha's teaching: Transforming suffering into peace, joy, and liberation
- Ireland J. D., 1997, The Udana: Inspired utterances of the Buddha
- Phillipson E., 1978, The American Review of Respiratory Disease, 117, 903
- Solloway S. G., 2007, Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 359
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Dam, N. T., van Vugt, M. K., Vago, D. R., Schmalzl, L., Saron, C. D., Olendzki, A., Meissner, T., Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Gorchov, J., et al. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617709589 · Cited by 1,506
Vago, D. R., & Silbersweig, D. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00296 · Cited by 1,310
Loving-Kindness and Compassion Meditation: Potential for Psychological Interventions
Hofmann, S. G., Grossman, P., & Hinton, D. E. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.003 · Cited by 960
Self-citationKiken, L. G., Garland, E. L., Bluth, K., Palsson, O. S., & Gaylord, S. A. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.044 · Cited by 717
Lutz, A., Jha, A. P., Dunne, J. D., & Saron, C. D. (2015) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0039585 · Cited by 697
Metadata
- Authors
- Grossman, P., & Van Dam, N. T.
- ORCID
- Grossman, Paul
- Venue
- Contemporary Buddhism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-05-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-239
- ISSN
- 1463-9947 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-7953
- OpenAlex
- W2169256687
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 35.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Contemporary Buddhism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- mindfulness, sati, Buddhist phenomenology, mindfulness-based interventions, mindfulness measurement, self-report inventory, insight meditation, Western psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
