Cited by 170Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Effectiveness of self-compassion-related interventions for reducing self-criticism: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Wakelin, Katherine E., Perman, Gemma, Simonds, Laura M.·2022·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Self-criticism is the process of negative self-evaluation. High levels are associated with psychopathology and poorer therapeutic outcomes. Self-compassion interventions were developed to explicitly target self-criticism. The aim of this review was to estimate the overall effect of self-compassion-related interventions on self-criticism outcomes and investigate potential moderating variables. A systematic search of the literature identified 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria. Nineteen papers, involving 1350 participants, had sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis. Pre- and post-data points were extracted for the compassion and control groups. Study quality was assessed using an adapted version of the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool, which concluded that studies were of moderate quality. Meta-analysis findings indicated that self-compassion-related interventions produce a significant, medium reduction in self-criticism in comparison with control groups (Hedges' g = 0.51, 95% CI [0.33-0.69]). Moderator analysis found greater reductions in self-criticism when self-compassion-related interventions were longer and compared with passive controls rather than active. The remaining moderators of forms of self-criticism, sample type, intervention delivery, intervention setting and risk of bias ratings were insignificant. Overall, the review provides promising evidence of the effectiveness of self-compassion-related interventions for reducing self-criticism. However, results are limited by moderate quality studies with high heterogeneity. Directions for future research indicate that more RCTs with active controls, follow-ups, consistent use and reporting of measures and diverse samples are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.2586

Cites

140 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies focusing on parental caregiving consistently indicate that parents who cultivate higher levels of self-compassion experience reduced levels of parenting stress, guilt, shame, and self-criticism while concurrently reporting greater levels of parenting satisfaction, competence, and overall well-being.

    “Studies focusing on parental caregiving consistently indicate that parents who cultivate higher levels of self-compassion experience reduced levels of parenting stress, guilt, shame, and self-criticism [73] while concurrently reporting greater levels of parenting satisfaction, competence, and overall well-being [47,73].”

    From Roles of Parental Psychological Flexibility, Self-Compassion, and Self-Efficacy in Affecting Mental Health and Quality of Life in Parents of Children with Eczema (2023) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Abstract (p. 1) reports that self-compassion-related interventions reduced self-criticism across the trials reviewed, and the study table (p. 14) identifies a parenting-focused self-judgment measure. The paper does not establish the broader claim that parents consistently experience less parenting stress, guilt, and shame or greater parenting satisfaction, competence, and well-being. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression . New York: Guildford Press.
  2. Halamová, J., Kanovský, M., & Pacúchová, M. (2017). Robust psychometric analysis and factor structure of the forms of self-criticizing/attacking and self-reassuring scale. Č eskoslovenská Psychologie , 61 (4), 331 -349.
  3. Higgins, J. P., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.) (2020). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Version 6.1 . New Jersey USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Hofmann, S. G., Grossman, P., & Hinton, D. E. (2011). Lovingkindness and compassion meditation: Potential for psychological interventions. Clinical Psychology Review , 31 , 1126 -1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr. 2011.07.003 · DOI
  5. Kim, J. J., Kent, K. M., Cunnington, R., Gilbert, P., & Kirby, J. N. (2020). Attachment styles modulate neural markers of threat and imagery when engaging in self-criticism. Scientific Reports , 10 (1), 1 -10. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70772- · DOI
  6. Ozawa-de Silva, B., & Negi, L. T. (2013). Cognitively-based compassion training (CBCT) -Protocol and key concepts. In T. Singer & M. Bolz (Eds.), Compassion: Bridging theory and practice: A multimedia book (pp. 417 -438). Leipzig, Germany: Max-Planck Institute.
  7. World Health Organization. (2004). ICD-10: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: Tenth revision (2nd ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.
  8. How to cite this article: Wakelin, K. E., Perman, G., & Simonds, L. M. (2022). Effectiveness of self-compassion-related interventions for reducing self-criticism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy , 29 (1), 1 -25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2586

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wakelin, K. E., Perman, G., & Simonds, L. M.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Wakelin, Katherine E.
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-05
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
1-25
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W3137777394
Cited by
170
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
self-compassion interventions, self-criticism, negative self-evaluation, intervention effectiveness, intervention duration, psychopathology, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Self-Compassion, Humans, Self-Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review