Cited by 18Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

Candida auris biofilm: a review on model to mechanism conservation

Khari, Arsha, Biswas, Biswambhar, Gangwar, Garima, Thakur, Anil, Puria, Rekha·2023·Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy

Abstract

Introduction Candida auris is included in the fungal infection category ‘critical’ by WHO because of associated high drug tolerance and spread at an alarming rate which if remains untouched may result in serious outbreaks. Since its discovery in 2009, several assiduous efforts by mycologists across the world have deciphered its biology including growth physiology, drug tolerance, biofilm formation, etc. The differential response of various strains from different clades poses a hurdle in drawing a final conclusion.Areas covered This review provides brief insights into the understanding of C. auris biofilm. It includes information on various models developed to understand the biofilms and conservation of different signaling pathways. Significant development has been made in the recent past with the generation of relevant in vivo and ex vivo models. The role of signaling pathways in the development of biofilm is largely unknown.Expert opinion The selection of an appropriate model system is a must for the accuracy and reproducibility of results. The conservation of major signaling pathways in C. auris with respect to C. albicans and S. cerevisiae highlights that initial inputs acquired from orthologs will be valuable in getting insights into the mechanism of biofilm formation and associated pathogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14787210.2023.2179036

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C. auris biofilms are distinct from C. albicans biofilms and usually consist of yeast cells with a low amount of extracellular matrix.

    “C. auris biofilms are distinct from that of C. albicans and usually consist of yeast cells with a low amount of extracellular matrix (12).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khari, A., Biswas, B., Gangwar, G., Thakur, A., & Puria, R.
Affiliations
  • Gautam Buddha University (IN)
  • Regional Centre for Biotechnology (IN)
Corresponding author
Puria, Rekha
Venue
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy
Published
2023-02-16
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
295-308
ISSN
  • 1478-7210 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8336
OpenAlex
W4319657018
Cited by
18
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
SERB (CRG/2021/003585)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
Candida auris, biofilm formation, signaling pathways, drug tolerance, pathogenesis, antifungal resistance
MeSH terms
Candida auris, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candida albicans, Humans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Reproducibility of Results, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review