Cited by 38Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsDigital Mental Health InterventionsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

The role of “on demand” therapist guidance vs. no support in the treatment of tinnitus via the internet: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Rheker, Julia, Andersson, Gerhard, Weise, Cornelia·2015·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Internet-based cognitive behavioral self-help treatments (iCBT) have been shown to successfully reduce the distress associated with tinnitus. Despite this success, little is known about the mechanisms that make iCBT for tinnitus sufferers work. Availability of minimal therapeutic support is assumed to positively influence treatment outcome in iCBT, but the lower limit of required support is not known. In face-to-face therapy, patients' positive outcome expectations have demonstrated an advantageous effect on outcome. The first aim of our study was thus to investigate the role of ‘on demand’ therapeutic guidance vs. no therapeutic support on treatment outcome in an iCBT for tinnitus sufferers. Our second aim was to investigate whether positive outcome expectations can predict treatment outcome. A total of 112 tinnitus patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups (support-on-demand or non-support). Both groups received an established iCBT treatment for tinnitus. While participants in the support group (n = 56) could ask a therapist for additional support, those in the other (n = 56) received no therapeutic guidance. Tinnitus distress was assessed pre- and post-treatment via the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the Mini-Tinnitus Questionnaire (Mini-TQ). Pre-treatment outcome expectations were assessed using the Patient Questionnaire on Therapy Expectation and Evaluation (PATHEV). We observed significantly less tinnitus distress in the THI (support: t(55) = 7.51, p ≤ .001; non-support: t(55) = 7.68, p ≤ .001) and Mini-TQ (support: t(55) = 8.24, p ≤ .001; non-support: t(55) = 8.46, p ≤ .001) in both groups from pre- to post-treatment, but no significant differences between the groups or interactions. The PATHEV subscale “Hope of Improvement” significantly predicted treatment outcome as measured by the THI (β = 0.28, p = .027). The iCBT self-help program is a good treatment option for tinnitus sufferers whether or not support-on-demand is provided. Furthermore, our results show the importance of outcome expectations to the efficacy of iCBT in tinnitus patients. Future research should focus on discovering further predictors of treatment outcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2015.03.007

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baguley, D.M., Andersson, G., McKenna, L., McFerran, D.J., 2013. Tinnitus: A Multidisciplin- ary Approach. 2nd ed. Wiley, Chichester.
  2. Hiller, W., Goebel, G., 2004. Rapid assessment of tinnitus-related psychological distress using the Mini-TQ. Int. J. Audiol. 43, 600-604 (Retrieved from http://www.isa- audiology.org/periodicals/2002-2004_International_Journal_of_Audiology/IJA, 2004, Vol. 43/No. 10 (555-607)/Hiller Goebel, IJA, 2004.pdf).
  3. Lockwood, A.H., Salvi, R.J., Burkard, R.F., 2002. Tinnitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 347 (12), 904-910.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rheker, J., Andersson, G., & Weise, C.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Rheker, Julia
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
189-199
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019991991
Cited by
38
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
German Research Foundation (RI 574/22-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
tinnitus, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, outcome expectations, treatment outcome predictors, tinnitus distress, self-help treatment, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review