Cited by 121Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyMedia and Digital Communication

Experimentally manipulating social media abstinence: results of a four-week diary study

Hall, Jeffrey A., Xing, Chong, Ross, Elaina M., Johnson, Rebecca M.·2021·Media Psychology

Abstract

Social media use has a weak, negative association with well-being in cross-sectional and longitudinal research, but this association in experimental studies is mixed. This investigation explores whether social media abstinence leads to improved daily well-being over four weeks of time. Community and undergraduate participants (N = 130) were randomly assigned to five experimental conditions: no change in social media use, and one week, two weeks, three weeks, and four weeks abstinence from social media (i.e., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat). All participants completed a daily diary measuring loneliness, well-being, and quality of day. Results showed no main effect of social media abstinence. The duration of abstinence was not associated with change in outcomes and order of abstinence did not explain variance in outcomes. Results are consistent with trivial effects detected in large cross-sectional research, and call into question the causal relationship between social media and well-being on the daily level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15213269.2019.1688171

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hall et al. found that social media abstention did not account for changes in loneliness or subjective well-being.

    “For instance, Hall et al. (40) manipulated social media use by randomly assigning undergraduates to varying durations of abstinence (0, 2, 3, and 4 weeks) and found that social media abstention did not account for changes in loneliness or subjective well-being [see (41) for similar finding].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, J. A., Xing, C., Ross, E. M., & Johnson, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Jeffrey A.
Venue
Media Psychology
Published
2019-11-05
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
259-275
ISSN
  • 1521-3269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-785X
OpenAlex
W2986891606
Cited by
120
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 30
FWCI
29.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Media Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Kansas (GRF# 2177080.)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social media use, well-being, loneliness, daily diary, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, causal effects, abstinence duration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review