Cited by 429Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and SynchronizationSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Enhancing Empathy and Theory of Mind

Goldstein, Thalia R., Winner, Ellen·2012·Journal of Cognition and Development

Abstract

Social cognitive skills such as empathy and theory of mind are crucial for everyday interactions, cooperation, and cultural learning, and deficits in these skills have been implicated in pathologies such as autism spectrum disorder, sociopathy, and nonverbal learning disorders. Little research has examined how these skills develop after early childhood and how they may be trained. We tested the hypothesis that experience in acting, an activity in which one must step into the shoes of others, leads to growth in both empathy and theory of mind. In two studies, we followed children (elementary school aged) and adolescents (high school freshmen) receiving 1 year of either acting or other arts training (visual arts, music) and assessed empathy and theory of mind before and after training. In both studies, those receiving acting (but not other arts) training showed significant gains in empathy scores; in Study 2, adolescents receiving acting training also showed significant gains on a naturalistic measure of theory of mind, the Empathic Accuracy Paradigm. These findings demonstrate plasticity in empathy and theory of mind long past the watershed age of 3 to 4 years and suggest that both capacities are enhanced by role-playing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15248372.2011.573514

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611 · DOI
  2. Hetland L., 2007, Habits of mind: The real benefits of visual arts education
  3. Hull L. S., 1985, Strasberg's method: As taught by Lorrie Hull
  4. Ickes W., 2001, Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement, 219

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldstein, T. R., & Winner, E.
Affiliations
Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
Goldstein, Thalia R.
Venue
Journal of Cognition and Development
Published
2012-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
19-37
ISSN
  • 1524-8372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7647
OpenAlex
W2117550821
Cited by
429
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
35.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cognition and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
empathy, theory of mind, actor training, role play, social cognition development, artistic training, autism spectrum disorder, sociopathy, nonverbal learning disabilities, children, adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review