Cited by 18Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

A Multisite, Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study Describing “Usual Care” Intervention Strategies for School-Age to Transition-Age Youth With Autism

Open access
Kerns, Connor M., Moskowitz, Lauren J., Rosen, Tamara, Drahota, Amy, Wainer, Allison, Josephson, Anne R., Soorya, Latha, Cohn, Elizabeth +2 more·2019·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

Understanding usual care is important to reduce health disparities and improve the dissemination of evidence-based practices for youth (ages 7-22 years) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A barrier to describing "usual ASD care" is the lack of a common vocabulary and inventory of the practices used by a diverse provider field. To address this barrier, we gathered input from expert providers to develop an inventory of usual care practices and assess expert familiarity and perceptions of these practices as interventions for anxiety, externalizing, and social difficulties in ASD. Purposeful sampling recruited 66 expert ASD providers representing multiple disciplines from 5 sites. Via a 2-round Delphi poll, experts reviewed, suggested revisions to and rated 49 literature-derived practices on several dimensions (familiarity, usefulness, common use, research support). A revised list of 55 practices and anonymous summary of group characteristics and ratings was then returned for further review. Results yielded 55 intervention practices, 48 of which were identified as "familiar" approaches by consensus (≥ 75% endorsement). Greater variation was observed in practices identified by consensus as most often used, useful, and research supported, depending upon the target problem. Findings provide an inventory of practices, reflective of the multidisciplinary language and approaches of expert ASD providers. This inventory may be used to better assess what constitutes usual care for youth with ASD in the United States. Moreover, findings offer insights from clinical experts regarding the range and acceptability of practices that may inform and ground treatment research, dissemination, and implementation efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2017.1410826

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providers who deliver ASD-EBPs to individuals with ASD also commonly use preference-based practices with unestablished or undetermined evidence for use.

    “Additionally, self-report and observational data demonstrate that providers who deliver ASD-EBPs to individuals with ASD also commonly use preference-based practices with unestablished or undetermined evidence for use (Brookman-Frazee et al., 2010; Pickard et al., 2018; Kerns et al., 2019).”

    From Implementation-as-Usual in Community-Based Organizations Providing Specialized Services to Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Mixed Methods Study (2021) · cites this paper as Kerns et al., 2019

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that experts viewed some ASD evidence-based practices as commonly used and describes a practice not yet empirically examined despite widespread use. But the study used expert Delphi ratings, not observational data, and its Limitations section says it was not designed to provide a representative picture of community practice. It therefore does not establish that providers delivering EBPs also commonly use the less-supported practices. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerns, C. M., Moskowitz, L. J., Rosen, T., Drahota, A., Wainer, A., Josephson, A. R., Soorya, L., Cohn, E., Chacko, A., & Lerner, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • St. John's University (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Adelphi University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Kerns, Connor M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2018-01-31
Volume
48
Issue
sup1
Pages
S247-S268
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2793906341
Cited by
18
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD087472)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH093477, R01MH110585)
  • Simons Foundation (SFARI# 381283;)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, usual care, intervention strategies, expert consensus, anxiety, externalizing problems, social difficulties, evidence-based practice dissemination, health disparities
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Delphi Technique, Female, Humans, Male, Schools, Consensus, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review