CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DNA-dependent protein kinase regulates lysosomal AMP-dependent protein kinase activation and autophagy

Puustinen, Pietri, Keldsbo, Anne, Corcelle-Termeau, Elisabeth, Ngoei, Kevin, Sønder, Stine L., Farkas, Thomas, Kaae Andersen, Klaus, Oakhill, Jon S., Jäättelä, Marja·2020·Autophagy
DOI 10.1080/15548627.2019.1710430
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15548627.2019.1710430

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 2 DNA-PKcs regulates autophagy in an AMPK-and ULK1-dependent manner.
Figure 2 DNA-PKcs regulates autophagy in an AMPK-and ULK1-dependent manner.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 3 Dynamic association of DNA-PKcs, AMPK complex and ULK1.
Figure 3 Dynamic association of DNA-PKcs, AMPK complex and ULK1.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 4 DNA-PKcs phosphorylates AMPK γ 1.
Figure 4 DNA-PKcs phosphorylates AMPK γ 1.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 5 DNA-PKcs regulates AMPK γ 1 localization and activity
Figure 5 DNA-PKcs regulates AMPK γ 1 localization and activityCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 6 DNA-PKcs regulates lysosomal localization and LKB1 association of AMPK
Figure 6 DNA-PKcs regulates lysosomal localization and LKB1 association of AMPKCC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014556 · DOI
  2. 10.4161/auto.23323 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.06.014 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.10.009 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41467-017-00628-y · DOI
  6. 10.1083/jcb.201710039 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nrc1412 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nature08467 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1039/C5TX00043B · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.021 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.08.018 · DOI
  13. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4202 · DOI
  14. 10.4161/auto.5.7.9443 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.04.002 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.biochi.2003.10.011 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.09.060 · DOI
  18. 10.4161/auto.7.8.15770 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20498.x · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.08.022 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/cr.2014.150 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gku1267 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.09.005 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1126/science.1217032 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/emboj.2009.364 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.0913860107 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.18632/oncotarget.12712 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.12.029 · DOI
  31. 10.1083/jcb.152.4.765 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/s41422-018-0080-0 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.05.032 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nature23275 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1009705107 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.008 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.040 · DOI
  39. Jäättelä M, 1995, Oncogene, 10, 2297
  40. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.009 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1083/jcb.127.2.467 · DOI
  42. 10.1128/MCB.20.20.7613-7623.2000 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0022-1759(92)90122-A · DOI
  44. 10.4161/cc.6.22.4927 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/15548627.2016.1159378 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.03.008 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7598-3_10 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01578-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 57

Metadata

Authors
Puustinen, P., Keldsbo, A., Corcelle-Termeau, E., Ngoei, K., Sønder, S. L., Farkas, T., Kaae Andersen, K., Oakhill, J. S., & Jäättelä, M.
Affiliations
  • Cell Death and Metabolism Unit, Centre for Autophagy, Recycling and Disease (CARD), Danish Cancer Society Research Center (DCRC), Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Metabolic Signaling Laboratory, St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  • Statistics, Bioinformatics and Registry, Danish Cancer Society Research Center (DCRC), Copenhagen, Denmark
ORCID
Venue
Autophagy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2020-01-26
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1871-1888
ISSN
  • 1554-8627
  • 1554-8635
DOI
10.1080/15548627.2019.1710430
Cited by
57
References
8
Language
en
Funders
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (DNRF125)
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology (CA15138)
  • European Research Council (AdG 340751)
  • Kræftens Bekæmpelse (R40-A1793)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (?)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (12OC0001341)
  • Australian Research Council (?)
  • State Government of Victoria (?)
  • Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd (0602-02707B)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review