The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Involvement of CASP9 (caspase 9) in IGF2R/CI-MPR endosomal transport
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Thus, an increase in pro-CTSD is considered a reliable indicator of impaired retromer-dependent trafficking (Benes et al., 2008; Rojas et al., 2008; Han et al., 2021), and ultimately lysosomal dysfunction.”
From The neuronal retromer can regulate both neuronal and microglial phenotypes of Alzheimer's disease (2022) · cites this paper as Han et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Retromer: A Master Conductor of Endosome Sorting
Burd, C., & Cullen, P. J. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016774 · Cited by 435
Research works printed but not linked: 70
- 10.1074/jbc.M113.536854 · DOI
- 10.1080/15548627.2018.1434471 · DOI
- 10.1080/15548627.2019.1695398 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.012 · DOI
- Henry CM, 2017, Mol Cell, 65, e5
- 10.1242/jcs.024547 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.09.016 · DOI
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a016857 · DOI
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a016840 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/auto.28448 · DOI
- 10.4161/auto.1.1.1270 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.12.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.10.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jcs.103440 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1042/BST20140290 · DOI
- 10.1111/tra.12237 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.056 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)03055-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01201.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00993.x · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2009.272 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-05345-8 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.02978 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201702137 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41556-019-0393-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1083/jcb.200312034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1083/jcb.200312055 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.07.014 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.03302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/bs.mcb.2015.03.018 · DOI
- 10.1111/tra.12542 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.201703015 · DOI · Paper page
- Cui Y, J Cell Biol
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81476-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81477-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcp.26516 · DOI
- 10.1080/15548627.2017.1356549 · DOI
- 10.3389/fcell.2018.00128 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.047 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-7477-1_5 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-8820-4_9 · DOI
- 10.1111/jnc.14461 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M300750200 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06648.x · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb06218.x · DOI
- 10.1042/bj3300903 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.271.25.15166 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.051474 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.051 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M505036200 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0165-022X(00)00048-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41580-018-0053-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.08.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.046 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/20.17.5008 · DOI
- Checinska A, 2009, J Proteomics, 1793, 605
- 10.1083/jcb.149.4.901 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03046.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1612730114 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/emboj.2012.283 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.077 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/cr.2009.130 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.200907015 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M109.086587 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M611186200 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M109.081042 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M710169200 · DOI
- 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.09.074 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.200804048 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Receptor Recycling by Retromer
Carosi, J. M., Denton, D., Kumar, S., & Sargeant, T. J. (2023) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1080/10985549.2023.2222053 · Cited by 36
The neuronal retromer can regulate both neuronal and microglial phenotypes of Alzheimer's disease
Qureshi, Y. H., Berman, D. E., Marsh, S. E., Klein, R. L., Patel, V. M., Simoes, S., Kannan, S., Petsko, G. A., Stevens, B., & Small, S. A. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110262 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, J., Goldstein, L. A., Hou, W., Watkins, S. C., & Rabinowich, H.
- Affiliations
- Departments of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Venue
- Autophagy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-05-25
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1393-1409
- ISSN
- 1554-8627
- 1554-8635
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research
- Department of Defense (W81XWH-15-1-0048, W81XWH-16-1-0213)
- Veteran Administration Merit Review Award (I01 BX002307)
- U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-20-1-0005)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review