CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingCrime Patterns and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bullying: Short-Term and Long-Term Effects, and the Importance of Defiance Theory in Explanation and Prevention

Ttofi, Maria M., Farrington, David P.·2008·Victims & Offenders
DOI 10.1080/15564880802143397
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Bullying is often followed by short-term and long-term undesirable psychosocial consequences. Both victims and perpetrators of bullying tend to have high numbers of physical and psychological symptoms. In order to prevent bullying and its aversive results, it is important to formulate and test theories of bullying. This article investigates the usefulness of defiance theory in the explanation of the bullying of siblings in families and peers in schools. Questionnaires were completed by 182 children aged 11 to 12 in ten primary schools in Nicosia, Cyprus. We followed a vignette-based methodology to investigate children's defiant behavior. Children were given a hypothetical scenario—in which the perpetrator is sanctioned by the parents—and were then asked questions that aimed to investigate defiant or compliant reactions to the sanctions imposed. The type of child in the vignette was experimentally manipulated so that children could make inferences regarding his/her intentionality of wrongdoing. The results indicate that defiance theory is useful in explaining bullying behavior. The main implication from our research is that defiance theory can assist teachers and practitioners in implementing whole-school restorative justice approaches to reduce bullying in schools.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15564880802143397

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1177/0265407594112004 · DOI
  2. Brownfield D., 2006, Journal of Gang Research, 13, 31
  3. Chapell M.S., 2006, Adolescence, 41, 633
  4. Dietz B., Paper presented at International Conference on Peer Relations
  5. Farrington D.P., 1993, Crime and Justice: A review of research, 17, 381
  6. Morrison B., Paper presented at the International Conference on Violence in Schools and Public Policies, Palais de l' UNESCO
  7. Morrison B., 2007, Restoring safe school communities: A whole school response to bullying, violence and alienation
  8. Sherman L. W., 1995, Australian violence: Contemporary perspectives II, 207
  9. Sherman L.W., 2000, The defiant imagination: Consilience and the science of sanctions

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Farrington, David P.
ORCID
Venue
Victims & Offenders
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2008-05-14
Volume
3
Issue
2-3
Pages
289-312
ISSN
  • 1556-4886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4991
DOI
10.1080/15564880802143397
OpenAlex
W2067094531
Cited by
116
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Victims & Offenders (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
bullying, sibling bullying, peer bullying, sanctions, restorative justice, bullying prevention, elementary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review