Cited by 139Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Aerobic exercise reduces symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial

Fetzner, Mathew G., Asmundson, Gordon J.G.·2015·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

Evidence suggests aerobic exercise has anxiolytic effects; yet, the treatment potential for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and responsible anxiolytic mechanisms have received little attention. Emerging evidence indicates that attentional focus during exercise may dictate the extent of therapeutic benefit. Whether benefits are a function of attentional focus toward or away from somatic arousal during exercise remains untested. Thirty-three PTSD-affected participants completed two weeks of stationary biking aerobic exercise (six sessions). To assess the effect of attentional focus, participants were randomized into three exercise groups: group 1 (attention to somatic arousal) received prompts directing their attention to the interoceptive effects of exercise, group 2 (distraction from somatic arousal) watched a nature documentary, and group 3 exercised with no distractions or interoceptive prompts. Hierarchal linear modeling showed all groups reported reduced PTSD and anxiety sensitivity (AS; i.e., fear of arousal-related somatic sensations) during treatment. Interaction effects between group and time were found for PTSD hyperarousal and AS physical and social scores, wherein group 1, receiving interoceptive prompts, experienced significantly less symptom reduction than other groups. Most participants (89%) reported clinically significant reductions in PTSD severity after the two-week intervention. Findings suggest, regardless of attentional focus, aerobic exercise reduces PTSD symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2014.916745

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fetzner, M. G., & Asmundson, G. J. G.
Affiliations
University of Regina (CA)
Corresponding author
Asmundson, Gordon J.G.
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2014-06-09
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
301-313
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W2035606002
Cited by
139
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, aerobic exercise, stationary cycling, attentional focus, interoception, somatic arousal, anxiety sensitivity, hyperarousal, nature documentaries, anxiolytic effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Arousal, Attention, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Exercise, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review