Cited by 30COVID-19 and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Psychosocial predictors of virus and social distancing fears in undergraduate students living in a US COVID-19 “hotspot”

Fedorenko, Erick J., Kibbey, Mindy M., Contrada, Richard J., Farris, Samantha G.·2021·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is positioned to exact a substantial mental health toll on the global population. Heightened fears of viral contamination and fears of the negative consequences of social distancing (e.g., fears related to home confinement, fears of loneliness and isolation) might contribute to the distress caused by the pandemic. Cross-sectional data were collected from undergraduates ( N = 608) residing in a U.S. pandemic "hotspot" at the time of data collection (between 7 April to 9 May, 2020). Outcome variables included viral contamination fears and social distancing fears. Predictor variables included biological sex, underlying medical vulnerability, number of recent viral symptoms, presence of positive COVID-19 test in social network, anxiety, depression, stress, emotion dysregulation, intolerance of uncertainty, body vigilance, and health anxiety. Female sex, anxiety severity, intolerance of uncertainty, and health anxiety uniquely predicted fears of viral contamination. Female sex and depression severity uniquely predicted fears of social distancing. Multiple anxiety-related vulnerabilities are potential intervention targets for reducing viral contamination fears. Depression is a potential intervention target for social distancing fears. Females might be at greater risk for both types of fears.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2020.1866658

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fedorenko, E. J., Kibbey, M. M., Contrada, R. J., & Farris, S. G.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Farris, Samantha G.
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2021-02-15
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
217-233
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W3132441363
Cited by
30
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, psychosocial predictors, undergraduate students, sex differences, anxiety, depression, stress, emotional dysregulation, intolerance of uncertainty, health anxiety, body vigilance, loneliness and isolation, home confinement, medical vulnerability, viral symptoms
MeSH terms
Physical Distancing, COVID-19, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Fear, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Mental Health, Students, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review