Cited by 280Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychology Research and BibliometricsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

How WEIRD are positive psychology interventions? A bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials on the science of well-being

Open access
Hendriks, Tom, Warren, Meg A, Schotanus-Dijkstra, Marijke, Hassankhan, Aabidien, Graafsma, Tobi, Bohlmeijer, Ernst, de Jong, Joop·2019·The Journal of Positive Psychology

Abstract

The past two decades have witnessed a rapid rise in well-being research, and a profusion of empirical studies on positive psychology interventions (PPIs). This bibliometric analysis quantifies the extent to which rigorous research on PPIs that employ randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reaches beyond Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic (WEIRD) populations. A search was conducted through databases including PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus for studies from 1998 to 2017. In total, we found 187 full-text articles that included 188 RCTs from 24 countries. We found that RCTs on the efficacy of PPIs are still predominately conducted in western countries, which accounted for 78.2% of the studies. All these countries are highly industrialized and democratic, and study populations are often highly educated and have a high income. However, there has been a strong and steady increase in publications from non-Western countries since 2012, indicating a trend towards globalization of positive psychology research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17439760.2018.1484941

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [10]10. Cameron, K. (2016). Adressing criticism of positive psychol- ogy and positive organizational scholarship. Canadian Positive Psychology Association Conference, Niagara on the Lake.
  2. [20]20. Díaz, E. C., & González, J. C. S. (2012). The roots of positive psychology. Papeles Del Psicólogo, 33(3), 172-182.
  3. [24]24. In G. Bernal & M. Domenech Rodríguez (Eds), Cultural adaptations. Tools for evidence based practice with diverse populations (pp. 265-288). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  4. [34]34. Hendriks, T., Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Hassankhan, A., Graafsma, T., de Jong, J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2017). The efficacy of multicomponent positive psychology interven- tions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Manuscript Submitted for Publication.
  5. [48]48. La Roche, M., & Lustig, K. (2010). Cultural adaptations: Unpacking the meaning of culture. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 7, 26-30.
  6. [55]55. Luchetti, M. (2014). Global Health and the 10/90 gap. British Journal of Medical Practitioners, 7(4), a731.
  7. [59]59. Mody, A. (2004). What is an emerging market?. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 35(4), 641-664.
  8. [68]68. Schueller, S. M., & Parks, A. C. (2014). The science of self-help. European Psychologist, 19(2), 145-155.
  9. [86]86. Vazquez, C. (2013). Positive psychology and its enemies: A reply based on scientific evidence. Papeles Del Psicólogo, 34(2), 91-115.
  10. [88]88. In H. Selin & G. Davey (Eds.), Happiness across cultures (pp. 451-472). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hendriks, T., Warren, M. A., Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Hassankhan, A., Graafsma, T., Bohlmeijer, E., & de Jong, J.
Affiliations
  • Anton de Kom University of Suriname (SR)
  • Western Washington University (US)
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Hendriks, Tom
Venue
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Published
2018-08-29
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
489-501
ISSN
  • 1743-9760 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9779
OpenAlex
W2889446527
Cited by
280
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11
FWCI
20.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Positive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
positive psychology interventions, WEIRD populations, research generalizability, cross-cultural research, randomized controlled trials, well-being, globalization of science, publication trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review