Cited by 18Climate Change and GeoengineeringClimate Change Policy and EconomicsPolitical Philosophy and Ethics

The potential for climate engineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to reduce climate injustice

Open access
Svoboda, Toby, Irvine, Peter J., Callies, Daniel, Sugiyama, Masahiro·2018·Journal of Global Ethics

Abstract

Climate engineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections (SSAI) has the potential to reduce risks of injustice related to anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases. Relying on evidence from modeling studies, this paper makes the case that SSAI could have the potential to reduce many of the key physical risks of climate change identified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Such risks carry potential injustice because they are often imposed on low-emitters who do not benefit from climate change. Because SSAI has the potential to reduce those risks, it thereby has the potential to reduce the injustice associated with anthropogenic emissions. While acknowledging important caveats, including uncertainty in modeling studies and the potential for SSAI to carry its own risks of injustice, the paper argues that there is a strong case for continued research into SSAI, especially if attention is paid to how it might be used to reduce emissions-driven injustice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17449626.2018.1552180

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SAI's effects on temperature and precipitation distributions would likely affect agricultural systems, but the precise impacts are unknown.

    “SAI's effects on temperature and precipitation distributions would likely affect agricultural systems. The precise nature of these impacts are unclear (Kortetmäki and Oksanen, 2016; Irvine et al., 2017; Svoboda et al., 2018; Pamplany et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ulrike Niemeier and Claudia Timmreck, "What Is the Limit of Climate Engineering by Stratospheric Injection of SO2?," Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 15, no. 16 (2015): 9129-41.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Svoboda, T., Irvine, P. J., Callies, D., & Sugiyama, M.
Affiliations
  • Fairfield University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Svoboda, Toby
Venue
Journal of Global Ethics
Published
2018-09-02
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
353-368
ISSN
  • 1744-9626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-9634
OpenAlex
W2913331856
Cited by
18
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Global Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (N/A)
  • Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (N/A)
  • Harvard
  • ’s Solar Geoengineering Research Program (N/A)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
geoengineering, climate injustice, greenhouse gas emissions, climate risk, ethics of geoengineering, anthropogenic emissions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review