Cited by 62Climate Change and GeoengineeringClimate Change and Environmental ImpactEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Key impacts of climate engineering on biodiversity and ecosystems, with priorities for future research

Open access
McCormack, Caitlin G., Born, Wanda, Irvine, Peter J., Achterberg, Eric P., Amano, Tatsuya, Ardron, Jeff, Foster, Pru N., Gattuso, Jean-Pierre +27 more·2016·Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences

Abstract

Climate change has significant implications for biodiversity and ecosystems. With slow progress towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions, climate engineering (or ‘geoengineering’) is receiving increasing attention for its potential to limit anthropogenic climate change and its damaging effects. Proposed techniques, such as ocean fertilization for carbon dioxide removal or stratospheric sulfate injections to reduce incoming solar radiation, would significantly alter atmospheric, terrestrial and marine environments, yet potential side-effects of their implementation for ecosystems and biodiversity have received little attention. A literature review was carried out to identify details of the potential ecological effects of climate engineering techniques. A group of biodiversity and environmental change researchers then employed a modified Delphi expert consultation technique to evaluate this evidence and prioritize the effects based on the relative importance of, and scientific understanding about, their biodiversity and ecosystem consequences. The key issues and knowledge gaps are used to shape a discussion of the biodiversity and ecosystem implications of climate engineering, including novel climatic conditions, alterations to marine systems and substantial terrestrial habitat change. This review highlights several current research priorities in which the climate engineering context is crucial to consider, as well as identifying some novel topics for ecological investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1943815x.2016.1159578

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a paucity of research on SAI impacts, particularly so for catastrophic or worst-case impacts.

    “There is a paucity of research on SAI impacts (Irvine et al., 2016, 2017; MacMartin et al., 2016; McCormack et al., 2016; but see Schäfer et al., 2015 for an exception), particularly so for catastrophic or worst-case impacts.”

    From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as McCormack et al., 2016

    The paper identifies substantial knowledge gaps about the biodiversity and ecosystem effects of climate engineering, including stratospheric sulfate aerosols (Conclusion; §3.2.1). It also says these aerosols are relatively well studied through climate-model simulations (§3.2), so its evidence for a research paucity is specific to ecological impacts. Although §3.2.1 identifies limited understanding of the potentially severe termination effect, the paper does not establish that research is particularly scarce for catastrophic or worst-case impacts. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 111 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gove, B, Flower, KA, & Bradbury, RB. 2010. A review of environmental consequences of biomass production for UK energy consumption. Sandy, Bedfordshire: RSPB.
  2. IPCC. 2013. Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCormack, C. G., Born, W., Irvine, P. J., Achterberg, E. P., Amano, T., Ardron, J., Foster, P. N., Gattuso, J.-P., Hawkins, S. J., Hendy, E., Kissling, W. D., Lluch-Cota, S. E., Murphy, E. J., Ostle, N., Owens, N. J. P., Perry, R. I., Pörtner, H. O., Scholes, R. J., Schurr, F. M., Schweiger, O., Settele, J., Smith, R. K., Smith, S., Thompson, J., Tittensor, D. P., van Kleunen, M., Vivian, C., Vohland, K., Warren, R., Watkinson, A. R., Widdicombe, S., Williamson, P., Woods, E., Blackstock, J. J., & Sutherland, W. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Research Institute for Sustainability at GFZ (DE)
  • National Oceanography Centre (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C. (MX)
  • British Antarctic Survey (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
  • Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE)
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
  • UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (GB)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB)
  • Museum für Naturkunde (DE)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Royal Society (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sutherland, William J.
Venue
Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
Published
2016-03-23
Volume
13
Issue
2-4
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 1943-815X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-8168
OpenAlex
W2312793266
Cited by
62
References
111
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database IASS (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
  • Cambridge Conservation Initiative
  • Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies
  • Arcadia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
geoengineering, biodiversity impacts, ecosystem impacts, ocean fertilization, carbon dioxide removal, solar radiation management, marine ecosystems, research priorities, knowledge gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review