Cited by 217Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesGut microbiota and healthDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non-caloric artificial sweeteners and the microbiome: findings and challenges

Open access

Abstract

Non-caloric artificial sweeteners (NAS) are common food supplements consumed by millions worldwide as means of combating weight gain and diabetes, by retaining sweet taste without increasing caloric intake. While they are considered safe, there is increasing controversy regarding their potential ability to promote metabolic derangements in some humans. We recently demonstrated that NAS consumption could induce glucose intolerance in mice and distinct human subsets, by functionally altering the gut microbiome. In this commentary, we discuss these findings in the context of previous and recent works demonstrating the effects of NAS on host health and the microbiome, and the challenges and open questions that need to be addressed in understanding the effects of NAS consumption on human health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19490976.2015.1017700

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Andersson C, 2014, Metabolism
  2. de Matos Feijjóa F, 2013, Appetite
  3. David LA, 2014, Nature
  4. Cowan TE, 2013, FASEB J, 27, 224
  5. Oldacay M, 2000, Turk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg, 30, 35
  6. 10.1177/0022034-5900690080601 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–217 of 217

Metadata

Authors
Suez, J., Korem, T., Zilberman-Schapira, G., Segal, E., & Elinav, E.
Affiliations
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Segal, Eran
  • Elinav, Eran
Venue
Gut Microbes
Published
2015-03-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
149-155
ISSN
  • 1949-0976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-0984
OpenAlex
W1499229679
Cited by
217
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut Microbes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
gut microbiota, impaired glucose tolerance, metabolic disorders, weight gain, diabetes mellitus, host-microbiome interactions, sweetener safety, human health effects
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Diet, Humans, Sweetening Agents, Glucose Intolerance, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review