Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Precipitation with polyethylene glycol followed by washing and pelleting by ultracentrifugation enriches extracellular vesicles from tissue culture supernatants in small and large scales

Open access
Ludwig, Anna‐Kristin, De Miroschedji, Kyra, Doeppner, Thorsten R., Börger, Verena, Ruesing, Johannes, Rebmann, Vera, Durst, Stephan, Jansen, Sören, Bremer, Michel, Behrmann, Elmar, Singer, Bernhard B., Jastrow, Holger, Kuhlmann, Jan Dominik, El Magraoui, Fouzi, Meyer, Helmut E., Hermann, Dirk M., Opalka, Bertram, Raunser, Stefan, Epple, Matthias, Horn, Peter A., Giebel, Bernd·2018·Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) provide a complex means of intercellular signalling between cells at local and distant sites, both within and between different organs. According to their cell‐type specific signatures, EVs can function as a novel class of biomarkers for a variety of diseases, and can be used as drug‐delivery vehicles. Furthermore, EVs from certain cell types exert beneficial effects in regenerative medicine and for immune modulation. Several techniques are available to harvest EVs from various body fluids or cell culture supernatants. Classically, differential centrifugation, density gradient centrifugation, size‐exclusion chromatography and immunocapturing‐based methods are used to harvest EVs from EV‐containing liquids. Owing to limitations in the scalability of any of these methods, we designed and optimised a polyethylene glycol (PEG)‐based precipitation method to enrich EVs from cell culture supernatants. We demonstrate the reproducibility and scalability of this method and compared its efficacy with more classical EV‐harvesting methods. We show that washing of the PEG pellet and the re‐precipitation by ultracentrifugation remove a huge proportion of PEG co‐precipitated molecules such as bovine serum albumine (BSA). However, supported by the results of the size exclusion chromatography, which revealed a higher purity in terms of particles per milligram protein of the obtained EV samples, PEG‐prepared EV samples most likely still contain a certain percentage of other non‐EV associated molecules. Since PEG‐enriched EVs revealed the same therapeutic activity in an ischemic stroke model than corresponding cells, it is unlikely that such co‐purified molecules negatively affect the functional properties of obtained EV samples. In summary, maybe not being the purification method of choice if molecular profiling of pure EV samples is intended, the optimised PEG protocol is a scalable and reproducible method, which can easily be adopted by laboratories equipped with an ultracentrifuge to enrich for functional active EVs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20013078.2018.1528109

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ludwig, A., De Miroschedji, K., Doeppner, T. R., Börger, V., Ruesing, J., Rebmann, V., Durst, S., Jansen, S., Bremer, M., Behrmann, E., Singer, B. B., Jastrow, H., Kuhlmann, J. D., El Magraoui, F., Meyer, H. E., Hermann, D. M., Opalka, B., Raunser, S., Epple, M., Horn, P. A., & Giebel, B.
Venue
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-17
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1528109-1528109
ISSN
2001-3078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897903541
Cited by
291
References
10
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.