Cited by 17Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyStudy and Philosophy of ReligionDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Existential neuroscience: a proximate explanation of religion as flexible meaning and palliative

Inzlicht, Michael, Tullett, Alexa M., Good, Marie·2011·Religion, Brain & Behavior

Abstract

The cognitive science of religion has made great strides in the past decade (e.g., Boyer, 2008), with more and better research from many disciplines asking basic questions about why religions exist...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2153599x.2011.653537

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., & Good, M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Inzlicht, Michael
Venue
Religion, Brain & Behavior
Published
2011-10
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
244-251
ISSN
  • 2153-5981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-599X
OpenAlex
W1996045346
Cited by
17
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Religion Brain & Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
religion, cognitive science of religion, meaning, evolution of religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review