CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 974News Media Framing and Political CommunicationMedia Influence and PoliticsSocial Media and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 209 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?

Open access
Van Aelst, Peter, Strömbäck, Jesper, Aalberg, Toril, Esser, Frank, de Vreese, Claes, Matthes, Jörg, Hopmann, David, Salgado, Susana, Hubé, Nicolas, Stępińska, Agnieszka, Papathanassopoulos, Stylianos, Berganza, Rosa, Legnante, Guido, Reinemann, Carsten, Sheafer, Tamir, Stanyer, James·2017·Annals of the International Communication Association
DOI 10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

During the last decennia media environments and political communication systems have changed fundamentally. These changes have major ramifications for the political information environments and the extent to which they aid people in becoming informed citizens. Against this background, the purpose of this article is to review research on key changes and trends in political information environments and assess their democratic implications. We will focus on advanced postindustrial democracies and six concerns that are all closely linked to the dissemination and acquisition of political knowledge: (1) declining supply of political information, (2) declining quality of news, (3) increasing media concentration and declining diversity of news, (4) increasing fragmentation and polarization, (5) increasing relativism and (6) increasing inequality in political knowledge.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551

Cites

209 of 209 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 210 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Barber M., 2013, Negotiating agreement in politics, 37
  2. 10.2307/1558352 · DOI
  3. Berelson B. R., 1954, Voting
  4. Blach-Ørsten M., 2016, Politik, 19
  5. 10.1093/esr/jcq05 · DOI
  6. Cook T., 1998, Governing with the news
  7. Davis A., 2014, Political journalism in transition. Western Europe in a comparative perspective, 111
  8. Ho D. E., 2009, Stanford Law Review, 61, 781
  9. Lippmann W., 1922, Public Opinion
  10. Mitchell A., 2016, The modern news consumer
  11. Papathanasopoulos S., 2011, European media structures, policies and identities
  12. Patterson T. E., 2013, Informing the news
  13. Reinemann C., 2016, Comparing political communication, 131
  14. Spivak C., 2011, American Journalism Review, 32, 38
  15. Tambini D., 2015, International Journal of Communication, 9, 1400
  16. Webster J. G., 2007, Media diversity and localism: Meaning and metrics, 309
  17. Zaller J., 1999, Market Competition and News Quality

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 973

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
  • Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Annals of the International Communication Association
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2017-01-02
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
3-27
ISSN
  • 2380-8977 (ISSN-L)
  • 2380-8985
DOI
10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
OpenAlex
W2563852632
Cited by
974
References
210
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 143 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 11
FWCI
148.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Annals of the International Communication Association (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
political communication, political information environment, democracy, political knowledge, news quality, media concentration, news diversity, media fragmentation, political polarization, relativism, citizen information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review