Cited by 284Mitochondrial Function and PathologyFungal and yeast genetics researchAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Regulation of Mitochondrial Morphology and Inheritance by Mdm10p, a Protein of the Mitochondrial Outer Membrane

Open access
Sogo, L F, Yaffe, M P·1994·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Yeast cells with the mdm10 mutation possess giant spherical mitochondria and are defective for mitochondrial inheritance. The giant mitochondria display classical features of mitochondrial ultrastructure, yet they appear incapable of movement or division. Genetic analysis indicated that the mutant phenotypes resulted from a single nuclear mutation, and the isolated MDM10 gene restored wild-type mitochondrial distribution and morphology when introduced into mutant cells. MDM10 encodes a protein of 56.2 kD located in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Depletion of Mdm10p from cells led to a condensation of normally extended, tubular mitochondria into giant spheres, and reexpression of the protein resulted in a rapid restoration of normal mitochondrial morphology. These results demonstrate that Mdm10p can control mitochondrial morphology, and that it plays a role in the inheritance of mitochondria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.126.6.1361

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ERMES complex is involved in mitochondrial fission, the distribution of mtDNA, and mitophagy.

    “The ERMES complex is also involved in mitochondrial fission, the distribution of mtDNA, and mitophagy [27,28,29,30,31,32,33].”

    From In Candida glabrata, ERMES Component GEM1 Controls Mitochondrial Morphology, mtROS, and Drug Efflux Pump Expression, Resulting in Azole Susceptibility (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

    The discussion (p. 1371) reports that mdm10 mutant mitochondria are generally defective in division and inheritance, supporting the fission-related part of the claim. The paper studies Mdm10p, but our copy does not establish a role for the ERMES complex in mtDNA distribution or mitophagy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Deletion mutants of the ERMES core complex display defects in the segregation of mtDNA into daughter cells, resulting in the loss of mitochondria over several generations of growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    “In particular, deletion mutants of the ERMES core complex display defects in the segregation of mtDNA into daughter cells, resulting in the loss of mitochondria over several generations of growth in S. cerevisiae [27,29,30,45].”

    From In Candida glabrata, ERMES Component GEM1 Controls Mitochondrial Morphology, mtROS, and Drug Efflux Pump Expression, Resulting in Azole Susceptibility (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results (pp. 1363–1364) report that an MDM10 mutant has defective mitochondrial inheritance: 60–65% of daughter buds lacked mitochondria under the stated growth conditions. The paper studies MDM10 rather than deletion mutants of the ERMES core complex as a group, and it does not establish defective mtDNA segregation or loss of mitochondria over several generations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sogo, L. F., & Yaffe, M. P.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
1994-09-15
Volume
126
Issue
6
Pages
1361-1373
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2140850020
Cited by
284
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM044614, GM44614)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
mitochondrial morphology, mitochondrial inheritance, mitochondrial outer membrane, giant mitochondria, mitochondrial division, mitochondrial distribution, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, nuclear mutations, mitochondrial ultrastructure
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Fungal Proteins, Intracellular Membranes, Membrane Proteins, Mitochondria, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review