Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plasticity in canine airway smooth muscle.

Open access
Pratusevich, V R, Seow, C Y, Ford, L E·1995·The Journal of general physiology

Abstract

The large volume changes of some hollow viscera require a greater length range for the smooth muscle of their walls than can be accommodated by a fixed array of sliding filaments. A possible explanation is that smooth muscles adapt to length changes by forming variable numbers of contractile units in series. To test for such plasticity we examined the muscle length dependence of shortening velocity and compliance, both of which will vary directly with the number of thick filaments in series. Dog tracheal smooth muscle was studied because its cells are arrayed in long, straight, parallel bundles that span the length of the preparation. In experiments where muscle length was changed, both compliance and velocity showed a strong dependence on muscle length, varying by 1.7-fold and 2.2-fold, respectively, over a threefold range of length. The variation in isometric force was substantially less, ranging from a 1.2- to 1.3-fold in two series of experiments where length was varied by twofold to an insignificant 4% variation in a third series where a threefold length range was studied. Tetanic force was below its steady level after both stretches and releases, and increased to a steady level with 5-6 tetani at 5 min intervals. These results suggest strongly that the number of contractile units in series varies directly with the adapted muscle length. Temporary force depression after a length change would occur if the change transiently moved the filaments from their optimum overlap. The relative length independence of the adapted force is explained by the reforming of the filament lattice to produce optimum force development, with commensurate changes of velocity and compliance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1085/jgp.105.1.73

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Pratusevich, V. R., Seow, C. Y., & Ford, L. E.
Venue
The Journal of general physiology
Published
1995-01-01
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
73-94
ISSN
  • 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7748
OpenAlex
W2147241594
Cited by
256
References
24
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasticity in canine airway smooth muscle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.105.1.73
The paper
Pratusevich, V. R., Seow, C. Y., & Ford, L. E. (1995). Plasticity in canine airway smooth muscle. The Journal of general physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.105.1.73

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.