Cited by 320Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionStress Responses and Cortisol

The programming of individual differences in defensive responses and reproductive strategies in the rat through variations in maternal care

Cameron, Nicole M., Champagne, Frances A., Parent, Carine, Fish, Eric W., Ozaki-Kuroda, Kumi, Meaney, Michael J.·2005·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

There are profound maternal effects on individual differences in defensive responses and reproductive strategies in species ranging literally from plants to insects to birds. Maternal effects commonly reflect the quality of the environment and are most likely mediated by the quality of the maternal provision (egg, propagule, etc.), which in turn determines growth rates and adult phenotype. In this paper, we review data from the rat that suggest comparable forms of maternal effects on both defensive responses to threat and reproductive behavior and which are mediated by variations in maternal behavior. Ultimately, we will need to contend with the reality that neural development, function and health are defined by social and economic influences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.022

Cites

265 of 265 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal models indicate that early caregiving is a primary influence on HPA axis development and adaptively shapes offspring development for an expected environment.

    “Research in animal models indicates early caregiving to be a primary influence on the development of the HPA axis (Champagne et al., 2008; Liu, Diorio, Day, Francis, & Meaney, 2000) and to adaptively shape offspring development to meet an expected environment (Cameron, Champagne, Parent, Fish, Ozaki-Kuroda, & Meaney, 2005).”

    From Salivary cortisol mediates effects of poverty and parenting on executive functions in early childhood (2011) · cites this paper as Cameron, Champagne, Parent, Fish, Ozaki-Kuroda, & Meaney, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cameron, N. M., Champagne, F. A., Parent, C., Fish, E. W., Ozaki-Kuroda, K., & Meaney, M. J.
Affiliations
Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Meaney, Michael J.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
29
Issue
4-5
Pages
843-865
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115003651
Cited by
320
References
260
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
maternal effects, maternal care, individual differences, defensive behavior, reproductive strategies, maternal behavior, rats, threat response, social environment, neural development
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Defense Mechanisms, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Individuality, Maternal Behavior, Phenotype, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Reproduction, Stress, Psychological, Reproductive Behavior, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review