The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examination of Psychological Processes Underlying Resistance to Persuasion
Abstract
Three modes of resistance to persuasion (biased assimilation, relative weighting of attributes, and minimization of impact) were examined in the context of a lon-gitudinal field study of the Clinton-Lewinsky affair and a lab experiment in the consumer setting. Only two of these modes (biased assimilation and relative weighting) were found to be sensitive to the refutability of the persuasive com-munication; the effectiveness of the remaining one (minimization of impact) was not influenced by this factor. Specifically, committed individuals demonstrated bi-ased assimilation in the face of easy to refute negative information, but this mode of resistance decreased in its effectiveness when the information became difficult to refute. The relative-weighting mode of resistance (decreasing the weight given to attributes influenced by the negative information and increasing the weight given to favorably evaluated attributes), in contrast, emerged only in the face of difficult to refute information, apparently when biased assimilation decreased in its effec-tiveness. The impact mode of resistance was fairly effective in the face of both easy and difficult to refute information. That is, committed respondents attempted to isolate the impact of the negative information to the target attribute, minimizing its spillover to the other attributes in the attitudinal representation in response to both easy and difficult to refute messages. That individuals with strong attitudes resist attitudechange is a well-accepted finding in the consumer behavior and psychology literature (e.g., Eagly and Chaiken 1995; Haugtvedt and Petty 1992; Petty and Cacioppo 1986). However, relatively little attention has been given to the psychological processes that mediate resistance to
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Sears, D. O. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.3.515 · Cited by 2,119
Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations.
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131 · Cited by 1,550 · cited 2×
“…by various variables such as its content, that is, the amount of strong and diagnostic information (Anderson 1981; Petty and Cacioppo 1986; Skowronski and Carlston 1989), its level of repetition (Anand and Sternthal 1990), and the ability of the respondents to counterargue it (Petty and…”
BackgroundA disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments.
Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.71.1.5 · Cited by 848
Cited by
Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N. (2010) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.6.128 · Cited by 533
Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour
Johnstone, M.-L., & Tan, L. P. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2316-3 · Cited by 413
The Impact of a Product-Harm Crisis on Marketing Effectiveness
Van Heerde, H., Helsen, K., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2007) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1060.0227 · Cited by 406
Building, measuring, and profiting from customer loyalty
Watson, G. F., Beck, J. T., Henderson, C. M., & Palmatier, R. W. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0439-4 · Cited by 375
Word of Mouse: The Role of Cognitive Personalization in Online Consumer Reviews
Xia, L., & Bechwati, N. N. (2008) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2008.10722143 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahluwalia, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-232
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2170051053
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examination of Psychological Processes Underlying Resistance to Persuasion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/314321
- The paper
- Ahluwalia, R. (2000). Examination of Psychological Processes Underlying Resistance to Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/314321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.