Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 722

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences

Ariely, Dan·2000·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

One of the main objectives facing marketers is to present consumers with information on which to base their decisions. In doing so, marketers have to select the type of information system they want to utilize in order to deliver the most appropriate information to their consumers. One of the most interesting and distinguishing dimensions of such information systems is the level of control the consumer has over the information system. The current work presents and tests a general model for understanding the advantages and disadvantages of Information-Control on consumers ’ decision quality, memory, knowledge, and confidence. The results show that controlling the information flow can help consumers better match their preferences, have better memory and knowledge about the domain they are examining, and be more confident in their judgments. However, it is also shown that controlling the information flow creates demands on processing resources and therefore under some circumstances can have detrimental effects on consumers ’ ability to utilize information. The paper concludes with a summary of the findings, discussion of their application for electronic commerce, and suggestions for future research avenues. One of the main objectives facing marketers is to present consumers with information on which to base their decisions (Anderson & Rubin 1986; Bettman 1975). Presenting such information is not simple and it contains an interesting dilemma. On the one hand, a vast amount of information could be relevant, even very relevant to some consumers. On the other hand, presenting superfluous information might impede consumers ’ ability to make good decisions

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/314322

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 722

Metadata

Authors
Ariely, D.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2000-09
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
233-248
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2101686155
Cited by
722
References
52
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/314322
The paper
Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/314322

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.