CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 216Family Dynamics and RelationshipsEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorIndigenous Cultures and Socio-Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Demography and Childcare in Preindustrial Societies

Hewlett, Barry S.·1991·Journal of Anthropological Research
DOI 10.1086/jar.47.1.3630579
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article considers the relationships between selected demographic structures (total fertility, infant and child mortality, sex-age distribution, divorce rate, causes of death) and childcare patterns among hunter-gatherers, horticulturalists, and pastoralists. Demographic data from fifty-seven preindustrial societies indicate that the demographic structure of a population can be useful for understanding intercultural variability in caregiving practices identified in "traditional" characterizations of childcare in these populations (e.g., indulgent care, multiple caregivers, multiage play groups). Analysis of demographic structures also identifies two "emergent" features of childcare in preindustrial populations that are infrequently mentioned in socialization studies of these populations: stepparent-stepchild relations and differential investment in sons and daughters.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/jar.47.1.3630579

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 216

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hewlett, B. S.
Corresponding author
Hewlett, Barry S.
ORCID
Hewlett, Barry S.
Venue
Journal of Anthropological Research
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
1991-04
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
1-37
ISSN
  • 0038-4801 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-7710
  • 2153-3806
DOI
10.1086/jar.47.1.3630579
OpenAlex
W1601344902
Cited by
216
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anthropological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
Keywords
child care, pre-industrial societies, hunter-gatherers, horticulturists, pastoralists, total fertility rate, infant mortality, child mortality, divorce rates, causes of death, caregiving practices, multiple caregivers
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Anthropology, Cultural, Behavior, Birth Rate, Child Care, Child Rearing, Culture, Demography, Developing Countries, Family Characteristics, Family Relations, Fertility, Foster Home Care, Geography, Infant Mortality, Mortality, Nuclear Family, Population, Population Characteristics, Population Dynamics, Psychology, Research, Sex, Sex Factors, Sex Ratio, Social Sciences, Social Values, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review