Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,477

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations

Open access
Berti, Emanuele, Barausse, Enrico, Cardoso, Vitor, Gualtieri, Leonardo, Pani, Paolo, Sperhake, Ulrich, Stein, Leo C, Wex, Norbert, Yagi, Kent, Baker, Tessa, Burgess, C P, Coelho, Flávio S, Doneva, Daniela, Felice, Antonio De, Ferreira, Pedro G, Freire, Paulo C C, Healy, James, Herdeiro, Carlos, Horbatsch, Michael, Kleihaus, Burkhard, Klein, Antoine, Kokkotas, Kostas, Kunz, Jutta, Laguna, Pablo, Lang, Ryan N, Li, Tjonnie G F, Littenberg, Tyson, Matas, Andrew, Mirshekari, Saeed, Okawa, Hirotada, Radu, Eugen, O’Shaughnessy, Richard, Sathyaprakash, Bangalore S, Broeck, Chris Van Den, Winther, Hans A, Witek, Helvi, Aghili, Mir Emad, Alsing, Justin, Bolen, Brett, Bombelli, Luca, Caudill, Sarah, Chen, Liang, Degollado, Juan Carlos, Fujita, Ryuichi, Gao, Caixia, Gerosa, Davide, Kamali, Saeed, Silva, Hector O, Rosa, João G, Sadeghian, Laleh, Sampaio, Marco, Sotani, Hajime, Zilhao, Miguel·2015·Classical and Quantum Gravity
DOI 10.1088/0264-9381/32/24/243001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

One century after its formulation, Einstein's general relativity (GR) has made remarkable predictions and turned out to be compatible with all experimental tests. Most of these tests probe the theory in the weak-field regime, and there are theoretical and experimental reasons to believe that GR should be modified when gravitational fields are strong and spacetime curvature is large. The best astrophysical laboratories to probe strong-field gravity are black holes and neutron stars, whether isolated or in binary systems. We review the motivations to consider extensions of GR. We present a (necessarily incomplete) catalog of modified theories of gravity for which strong-field predictions have been computed and contrasted to Einstein's theory, and we summarize our current understanding of the structure and dynamics of compact objects in these theories. We discuss current bounds on modified gravity from binary pulsar and cosmological observations, and we highlight the potential of future gravitational wave measurements to inform us on the behavior of gravity in the strong-field regime.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/32/24/243001

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,477

Metadata

Authors
Berti, E., Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., Gualtieri, L., Pani, P., Sperhake, U., Stein, L. C., Wex, N., Yagi, K., Baker, T., Burgess, C. P., Coelho, F. S., Doneva, D., Felice, A. D., Ferreira, P. G., Freire, P. C. C., Healy, J., Herdeiro, C., Horbatsch, M., Kleihaus, B., Klein, A., Kokkotas, K., Kunz, J., Laguna, P., Lang, R. N., Li, T. G. F., Littenberg, T., Matas, A., Mirshekari, S., Okawa, H., Radu, E., O’Shaughnessy, R., Sathyaprakash, B. S., Broeck, C. V. D., Winther, H. A., Witek, H., Aghili, M. E., Alsing, J., Bolen, B., Bombelli, L., Caudill, S., Chen, L., Degollado, J. C., Fujita, R., Gao, C., Gerosa, D., Kamali, S., Silva, H. O., Rosa, J. G., Sadeghian, L., Sampaio, M., Sotani, H., & Zilhao, M.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2015-12-01
Volume
32
Issue
24
Pages
243001
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
DOI
10.1088/0264-9381/32/24/243001
OpenAlex
W2116923776
Cited by
1,477
References
22
FWCI
70.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.